<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
>

<channel>
	<title>Simply Syndicated &#187; Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simplysyndicated.com/shows/simplyread/simplyread_music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:30:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/1.0.8" mode="advanced" entry="normal" -->
	<itunes:summary>Every show from the Simply Syndicated podcast network.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Simply Syndicated</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.simplysyndicated.com/images/ss.jpg" />
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Simply Syndicated</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>enquiries@simplysyndicated.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<managingEditor>enquiries@simplysyndicated.com (Simply Syndicated)</managingEditor>
	<copyright>Simply Syndicated</copyright>
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	
	<itunes:category text="Comedy" />
	<itunes:category text="TV &amp; Film" />
	<itunes:category text="Arts" />
		<item>
		<title>craigbevanmusic.com</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/craigbevanmusic-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/craigbevanmusic-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=5072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.simplysyndicated.com/wp-content/themes/v1/avatars/srmusic80.gif" width="80" height="80" alt="craigbevanmusic-com" />
Here&#8217;s Craig&#8217;s new music video. Go and check him out at http://www.craigbevanmusic.com.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.simplysyndicated.com/wp-content/themes/v1/avatars/srmusic80.gif" width="80" height="80" alt="craigbevanmusic-com" />
<p>Here&#8217;s Craig&#8217;s new music video. Go and check him out at <a href="http://www.craigbevanmusic.com" target="_blank">http://www.craigbevanmusic.com</a>.</p>
<p><object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WsFRHcV81gQ&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999&amp;hd=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WsFRHcV81gQ&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999&amp;hd=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/craigbevanmusic-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 33 &#8211; Pharoah Sanders : Summun, Bukmun, Umyun</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/pharoah-sanders-summun-bukmun-umyun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/pharoah-sanders-summun-bukmun-umyun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[african muisc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cecil mcbee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free-jazz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gary bartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lonnie liston smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharoah sanders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summun bukmun umyun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[woody shaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world fusion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=4795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Roll: 4 – 8 – 19
Result: Summun, Bukmun, Umyun by Pharoah Sanders.
Summun, Bukmun, Umyun (Deaf, Dumb, Blind) is the answer for those who ask the question, &#8220;Can world-fusion be anything other than watered-down, artistically innocuous schmaltz suitable only for Disney movies and zoo commercials?&#8221;
Of course, this album by Pharoah Sanders is also one which is partly responsible for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR-NEWBANNER-1.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.vervemusicgroup.com/images/local/250/2E904471D86243DD9E04842199F2B0CE.jpg" alt="" />Roll:</span> 4 <span style="color: #ff0000;">–</span> 8 <span style="color: #ff0000;">–</span> 19<br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">Result:</span> <em><strong>Summun, Bukmun, Umyun</strong></em> <span style="color: #ff0000;">by </span><strong>Pharoah Sanders</strong>.</p>
<p><em><strong>Summun, Bukmun, Umyun </strong></em>(Deaf, Dumb, Blind) is the answer for those who ask the question, &#8220;Can world-fusion be anything other than watered-down, artistically innocuous schmaltz suitable only for Disney movies and zoo commercials?&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, this album by <strong>Pharoah Sanders</strong> is also one which is partly responsible for the <strong>Putumayos</strong> of the world. Though world music has been recorded since the days of wax cylinders, the idea of blending it with Western musical styles really took off in the late-Sixties and seventies when African American musicians began exploring their roots beyond blues and jazz. Some of the best of these early fusions came out of the free-jazz scene</p>
<p><span id="more-4795"></span></p>
<p>The album opens with a repeated bass riff by <strong>Cecil McBee </strong>on the title track. Everyone with a free hand adds cowbell, hand drums, thumb piano, bylophone, and varied percussion to a ramshackle groove before <strong>Lonnie Liston Smith</strong> comes in on piano at the two-minute mark with a two-chord vamp reminiscent of <strong>Herbie Hancock</strong>. For the next 19 minutes Sanders (soprano sax), <strong>Gary Bartz</strong> (alto sax) and <strong>Woody Shaw </strong>(trumpet) trade riffs over the slightly discordant, untamed rhythm.</p>
<p>In many ways it&#8217;s one of Sander&#8217;s more accessible albums of his early free-jazz career. He keeps clear of his signature overblowing for most of the set and, at a casual listen, the band&#8217;s groove feels relatively sedate. At closer listen, the percussionists are treading a fine line between rhythm and chaos. By the ten-minute mark, the octet has progressed from a summer breeze into a firestorm. The second half of the track is dominated by African instruments (no vuvuzela, sadly) and vocalizations with Western musical ideals set aside in favour of pure expression.</p>
<p>The second track (side 2 of the ofiginal album), &#8220;<strong>Let Us Go Into The House Of The Lord</strong>&#8221; is a much more contemplative and traditionally spiritual piece. Sanders sax takes a backseat for most of the track letting McBee&#8217;s bowed bass improvisations weaving over and under Smiths uplifting chord progressions be the track&#8217;s focus. By the end the octet are twisting soaring melodies and rhythms around each other towards the light.</p>
<p>The album, and this track in particular, are a great place for people to start who are curious about—but afraid of—free-jazz and the more avant garde side of Sander&#8217;s time on <em>Impulse</em>.</p>
<p><em>(This is the last Bone Rolling Review selected before packing my CDs into boxes. It may be a while before they&#8217;re unpacked. See you then.)</em></p>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/pharoah-sanders-summun-bukmun-umyun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 32 &#8211; Sufjan Stevesn : Illinois</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-32-sufjan-stevesn-illinois/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-32-sufjan-stevesn-illinois/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bone rolling reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jakob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mr. dapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nerd Hurdles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sufjan stevens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=4694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Roll: 3 – 11 – 9
Result: Illinois  by Sufjan Stevens.
 
Sufjan Stevens didn&#8217;t mess around with the second installment in his project to write an album about each of the 50 United States. Any tribute to Illinois, the state that is home to both Chicago and gave birth to John Wayne Gacy, would have to be epic and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR-NEWBANNER-1.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em><strong>Roll</strong>: <strong><span style="color: #000000;">3</span> – <span style="color: #000000;">11 </span>– </strong><strong><span style="color: #000000;">9<br />
</span>Result</strong>:</em> <span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Illinois</strong> <strong> </strong></span><em>by </em><strong><span style="color: #000000;">Sufjan Stevens</span></strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em>.</em></span><br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;"><em> </em></span><br />
<img class="alignleft" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5RypW4jqNvE/RqqiBn3rpnI/AAAAAAAAAIU/LMxehjpkxNc/s400/sufjan_stevens_illinois_with_illegal_superman.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="240" /><strong>Sufjan Stevens </strong>didn&#8217;t mess around with the second installment in his project to write an album about each of the 50 United States. Any tribute to <em><strong>Illinois</strong></em>, the state that is home to both Chicago and gave birth to <strong>John Wayne Gacy,</strong> would have to be epic and it is.
<div>Perhaps a little too epic.</div>
<p><div>Even if it is a masterpiece of modern baroque folk, &#8220;too much of a good thing&#8221; is more than a pithy saying. If by the time you get to the 19th out of 22 tracks,  &#8221;<strong>The Seer&#8217;s Tower</strong>&#8220;, you&#8217;re not a little mentally and emotionally exhausted, you weren&#8217;t really listening to the album.</div>
<p><div><span id="more-4694"></span></div>
<div>Sufjan has the ability to write incredibly delicate minor-key melodies and flesh them out into  triumphant major-key symphonies. The effect is only heightened by his earnest, velvet-edged voice and for the first half of the album you can&#8217;t help feel like you&#8217;re listening to what Heaven must feel like.</div>
<p><div>It&#8217;s a near-perfect expression of history told through popular song. Yet, like a cat who suddenly decided they&#8217;ve had enough petting, I&#8217;ve never been able to listen to the album all the way through before something in my heart rejects all the spectacular beauty and says &#8220;enough!&#8221;</div>
<p><div>This usually happens around &#8220;<strong>They Are Night Zombies!</strong>&#8221; but sometimes it&#8217;s as soon as the close of the fourth track, an impossibly beautiful ballad about serial killer John Wayne Gacy.</div>
<p><div>And it&#8217;s really too bad since I&#8217;ve rarely listened to the gorgeous homage to <strong>Terry Riley</strong>&#8217;s <em><strong>In C</strong></em> and <strong>Phillip Glass</strong> which closes the album called, &#8220;<strong>Out of Egypt, Into the Great Laugh of Mankind&#8230;</strong>&#8220; </div>
<p><div>It&#8217;s too much, it&#8217;s too much, it&#8217;s too much!</div>
<p><div>Though this didn&#8217;t stop Stevens from releasing a second full volume of out-takes from the sessions called <strong><em>The Avalanche</em></strong>. Which, though not as relentlessly euphoric, I&#8217;ve also never listened to all the way through in one sitting.  </div>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-32-sufjan-stevesn-illinois/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 31 &#8211; Thom Yorke : The Eraser</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-31-yorke-eraser/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-31-yorke-eraser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 13:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amnesiac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bodysong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in rainbows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kid a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[krishnamurti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[krishnamurti quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiohead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the eraser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thom yorke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=4478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Roll: 3 – 3 – 11
Result: The Eraser  by Thom Yorke.


The level to which I identify with this album worries me somewhat. I suspect it doesn&#8217;t say much for the state of my mental health.
Especially since I&#8217;ve never been entirely sure too what the damn thing is about. Urban paranoia? Political paranoia? Interpersonal paranoia? Perhaps all three.
It would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR-NEWBANNER-1.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em><strong>Roll</strong>: <strong><span style="color: #000000;">3</span> – <span style="color: #000000;">3 </span>– </strong><strong><span style="color: #000000;">11<br />
</span>Result</strong>:</em> <span style="color: #000000;"><strong>The Eraser</strong> <strong> </strong></span><em>by </em><strong><span style="color: #000000;">Thom Yorke</span></strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em>.</em></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c8/Thom_Yorke_-_The_Eraser.jpg" alt="" />The level to which I identify with this album worries me somewhat. I suspect it doesn&#8217;t say much for the state of my mental health.</p>
<p>Especially since I&#8217;ve never been entirely sure too what the damn thing is about. Urban paranoia? Political paranoia? Interpersonal paranoia? Perhaps all three.</p>
<p>It would probably help if Yorke didn&#8217;t mumble like a hobo through the middle half of the album. But then fully understanding what he is prattling on about might ruin the illusion.</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>The fences that you cannot climb. The sentences that do not rhyme. In all that you can ever change. The one you&#8217;re looking for. It gets you down. There&#8217;s no spark. No light in the dark. It gets you down. You traveled far. What have you found. That there&#8217;s no time. To analyse. To think things through. To make sense</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>When this album came out in the summer of 2006, the songs &#8220;<strong>Anaylyse</strong>&#8221; (exerpted above) and &#8220;<strong>Black Swan</strong>&#8221; (<em>People get crushed like biscuit crumbs&#8230; I&#8217;m for spare parts, broken up</em>) became my personal mantras. I remember sitting at my desk with headphones on while repeatedly applying them to my aching soul like a salve.</p>
<p>I realize now, of course, that I was having one of my periodic nervous breakdowns. But there&#8217;s something about the songs on this album which never leave me. Something about how it reminds me of <strong>Krishnamurti</strong>&#8217;s famous words: &#8220;<strong><em>It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society</em></strong>.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-4478"></span>I suppose I should mention at this point in the review, for those of you who might not be aware, Thom Yorke is the lead singer of <strong>Radiohead</strong>. If you didn&#8217;t know that, due to living under a rock in a cave located on the property of a cloistered religious commune, you might also be interested to know <strong>Mick Jagger</strong> sings for the <strong>Rolling Stones</strong>.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/I/511qBcSBChL._AA240_.jpg" alt="" />I bring this delicate point up only because this album is a nice window into what it is Yorke brings, and doesn&#8217;t bring, to the Radiohead table.  <strong>Johnny Greenwood</strong>&#8217;s soundtrack to the film <em><strong>Bodysong</strong></em> is the other piece to the puzzle, showing one to be the <strong>Lennon</strong> to the other&#8217;s <strong>McCartney </strong>(or more accurately, perhaps, Lennon to the other&#8217;s <strong>Harrison</strong>), and demonstrating Radiohead wasn&#8217;t quite the exclusive Thom Yorke show people might have suspected.</p>
<p>Both albums are a bit like the sound of one of Radiohead&#8217;s hands clapping. <em>The Eraser </em>utilises one set of chord progressions from the Radiohead toolbox and <em>Bodysong </em>the other. I&#8217;d be willing to wager mash-ups of tracks from the two albums would probably end up sounding pretty close to <em><strong>In Rainbows</strong></em>.</p>
<p>By virtue of Yorke&#8217;s voice, <em>The Eraser </em>naturally sounds the most like a Radiohead album. Specifically, it calls to mind  <strong><em>Kid A/Amnesiac</em></strong>—the sessions from which some of the backing tracks actually orginated. When I <a href="http://www.simplysyndicated.com/bone-rolling-reviews-06-%e2%80%93-radiohead-amnesiac-3-disc-box/" target="_blank"><strong>reviewed</strong></a> the 3-disc edition of <em>Amnesiac</em>, I suggested the b-sides would make a fine third part to a <em>Kid A</em> trilogy.</p>
<p>I seem to have some kind of anxiety around this and feel the need to cap <em>KidA/Amnesiac</em> off with a third album. I&#8217;m going to suggest<em> The Eraser</em> would also do well in this regard. It&#8217;s the same chilly, glitched-out, laptop rock bolstering the same themes of urban isolation and the inability to adjust to a profoundly sick society.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the kind of music that appeals to someone with an OCD need to have everything ordered in groups of three.</p>
</div>
</div>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-31-yorke-eraser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ruff Cuts by Whip Buffley</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/ruff-cuts-by-whip-buffley/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/ruff-cuts-by-whip-buffley/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 03:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=4510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.simplysyndicated.com/wp-content/themes/v1/avatars/srmusic80.gif" width="80" height="80" alt="ruff-cuts-by-whip-buffley" />

Here&#8217;s a special treat for everyone! It&#8217;s a brand new EP by Whip Buffley featuring four tracks that aren&#8217;t available anywhere else. Wanna know what the best bit is? It&#8217;s free! All you have to do is click here to download the EP. That&#8217;s it, nothing else to do. No sign up, no email address, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.simplysyndicated.com/wp-content/themes/v1/avatars/srmusic80.gif" width="80" height="80" alt="ruff-cuts-by-whip-buffley" />
<div align="center"><div id="attachment_4512" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 270px"><a href="http://www.musicalmousemat.com/music/whipbuffley.html"><img class="size-medium wp-image-4512  " title="ruffsketch119" src="http://www.simplysyndicated.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/ruffsketch119-260x300.jpg" alt="" width="260" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Artwork by Jeremie Duval http://jeremieart.blogspot.com</p></div></div>
<p>Here&#8217;s a special treat for everyone! It&#8217;s a brand new EP by Whip Buffley featuring four tracks that aren&#8217;t available anywhere else. Wanna know what the best bit is? It&#8217;s free! All you have to do is <a href="https://mmmmusic.s3.amazonaws.com/wb/ruffcuts/RuffCuts.zip">click here</a> to download the EP. That&#8217;s it, nothing else to do. No sign up, no email address, no nothing. Just <a href="https://mmmmusic.s3.amazonaws.com/wb/ruffcuts/RuffCuts.zip">click this link</a> and download the free Whip Buffley EP.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like to hear more <a href="http://www.musicalmousemat.com/music/whipbuffley.html" target="_blank">Whip Buffley</a> tracks you can download his album <a href="http://www.musicalmousemat.com/music/whipbuffley/ruffaroundtheedges/rate.html" target="_blank">Ruff Around The Edges</a> on <a href="http://www.musicalmousemat.com/" target="_blank">MusicalMouseMat.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/ruff-cuts-by-whip-buffley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 30 &#8211; Pet Shop Boys: Very/Relentless</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-30/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1993]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cd design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cd packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[go west]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEGO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nerd Hurdles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pet shop boys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[very/relentless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=4310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Roll: 2 – 10 – 20
Result: Very/Relentless by Pet Shop Boys.


Before the industry figured out that you can sell more units if you put out the &#8220;special bonus disc edition&#8221; of an album after the standard edition—forcing fans to buy both if they want to have the album right away and the bonus disc, which of course we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR-NEWBANNER-1.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em><strong>Roll</strong>: <strong><span style="color: #000000;">2</span> – <span style="color: #000000;">10 </span>– </strong><strong><span style="color: #000000;">20<br />
</span>Result</strong>:</em> <strong><span style="color: #000000;">Very/Relentless </span></strong><em>by </em><strong><span style="color: #000000;">Pet Shop Boys</span></strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em>.</em></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/5a/PetShopBoysVeryRelentless.jpg" alt="" />Before the industry figured out that you can sell more units if you put out the &#8220;special bonus disc edition&#8221; of an album <em>after</em> the standard edition—forcing fans to buy both if they want to have the album right away <em>and</em> the bonus disc, which of course we all do—<strong>Pet Shop Boys</strong> released the initial run of their opulent 1993 album, <strong><em>Very</em></strong>, with an extra disc, <strong><em>Relentless</em></strong>.</p>
<p>It also featured some of the most innovative CD packaging, in both editions, yet designed.  In 1993 people only just starting to think outside the jewel case box and <em>Very/Relentless </em>shattered that with its three-pocket, bubblewrap-esque sleeve.  The subsequent single-disc edition of <em>Very</em> is, of course, the iconic orange &#8220;LEGO brick&#8221; design seen in abundance (5-million copies sold) at used CD shops worldwide.</p>
<p>Containing the hits &#8220;Can You Forgive Her&#8221;, &#8220;I Wouldn&#8217;t Normally Do This Kind of Thing&#8221;, &#8220;Yesterday, When I was Mad&#8221; and their cover of &#8220;Go West&#8221;, <em>Very </em>is very much essential listening for even the most casual Pethead, but is <em>Relentless</em>, very?</p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"> </span></p>
<p><span id="more-4310"></span><img class="alignright" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/d3/PetShopBoysVery.jpg/200px-PetShopBoysVery.jpg" alt="" />The answer is &#8220;no.&#8221; Though <em>Very</em> itself is very dense and, frankly, relentless,  <em>Relentless</em> isn&#8217;t very relentless at all.</p>
<p>At least not for an album titled <em>Relentless</em>. The concept behind the second disc is it&#8217;s hardcore dance floor music as opposed to the pop songs on the first disc, which is <em>very</em> Pet Shop Boys (see what they did there?).</p>
<p>The problem is <em>Relentless</em> relents. Though still one of the most abstract and flowing things the Boys have done, none of the tracks explode into pumelling hi-NRG beats but sort of float around the edges of hard-house and trance without really committing themselves.</p>
<p>Which is really only a problem with the title (more suitable to an album like <strong>Underworld</strong>&#8217;s <em>Second Toughest of The Infants</em>) and not the music itself. The set would have been much better ironically titled <em>Disco—</em>the package then being titled <em>Disco/Very,</em> a pun they used for the tour, I believe<em>—</em>only they&#8217;d already used <em>Disco </em>as a title for their 12&#8243; singles compilation. But, ever the urbane ironists, perhaps Pet Shop Boys meant <em>Relentless </em>to be ironic all along.</p>
<p>Continuing with the theme of irony, I don&#8217;t listen to <em>Very </em>very often because it is, as mentioned above, a tad relentless in its production. Elaborate orchestral arangements, thick beats, insanely hooky melodies, mens choirs and an underpinning of claustrophobic paranoia, all add-up to a relentlessly dense listening experience.</p>
<p>The Boys always have a punchy, high-impact/high-drama track or two on each album (&#8220;It&#8217;s a Sin&#8221;, &#8220;Always On My Mind&#8221;, &#8220;Love, etc&#8221;) but <em>Very</em> feels like <em>every </em>track is smacking you in the face with orchestra stabs and compressed kick drums. That&#8217;s not a bad thing by any stretch, but it can be a little intimidating when reaching for some light synth-pop to accompany your day. </p>
<p>Actually, to be perfectly honest, the album isn&#8217;t nearly as relentless as my subconscious is convinced it is. It&#8217;s really as introspective as any of their other albums, almost bilingual in the way it&#8217;s balanced between up- and down-tempo numbers. And the fact almost any of the tracks could have been a top-ten single release makes it an album which aims to please. Yes, it&#8217;s an album very much designed with nightlife in mind, but like most of their discography, its fundamental strength isn&#8217;t in its ability to party but in its concrete study of human psychology and behaviour. Setting <em>Very</em>&#8217;s own virtues aside, the alternative packaging (pop-art in itself) for <em>Very/Relentless</em> is an essential artifact for any Pethead.<br />
 </p>
</div>
</div>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 29 &#8211; CocoRosie : La Maison de Mon Rêve</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-29-cocorosie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-29-cocorosie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cocorosie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grey oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jakob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[la maison de mon reve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mr. dapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nerd Hurdles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=4265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Roll: 1 – 6 – 17
Result: La Maison de Mon Rêve (2004) / The Grey Oceans (2010) by CocoRosie.


When Devendra Banhart came out with Oh Me Oh My&#8230;in 2002, there was an air of mystery surrounding him (her? it?). You could have sworn it was creepy, backwoods folk music made by an honest to god creepy, possibly toothless, backwoods witch [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR-NEWBANNER-1.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em><strong>Roll</strong>: <strong><span style="color: #000000;">1</span> – <span style="color: #000000;">6 </span>– </strong><strong><span style="color: #000000;">17<br />
</span>Result</strong>:</em> <strong><span style="color: #000000;">La Maison de Mon Rêve (2004) / The Grey Oceans (2010) </span></strong><em>by </em><strong><span style="color: #000000;">CocoRosie</span></strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em>.</em></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">When <strong>Devendra Banhart</strong> came out with<em> <strong>Oh Me Oh My&#8230;</strong></em>in 2002, there was an air of mystery surrounding him (her? it?). You could have sworn it was creepy, backwoods folk music made by an honest to god creepy, possibly toothless, backwoods witch from a southern swamp. By 2004, this illusion had been shattered, Devendra wasn&#8217;t an 80-year-old black hag, but a rather dreamy young hippie-boy (in drag). But before quickly heading off to more commercially viable pastures, he succeeded in opening the door to creepy folk music for a lot of people. Picking up the tattered shawl where he left it, <strong>CocoRosie</strong> gave us creepy, southern-operati,c folk-tronic, ragtime-blues with their debut album,<em> <strong>La Maison de Mon Rêve</strong></em>. And after diverging into pop-music, like Devendra before them, it&#8217;s a sound they&#8217;ve somewhat returned to with <strong><em>Grey Oceans</em></strong>. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span id="more-4265"></span></span><br />
<img class="alignleft" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/30/Demonreve.jpg/200px-Demonreve.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>CocoRosie really know how to milk a shtick. Depending where your mind is at, that sentence may sound dirty. But that could be fitting since the shtick the duo (made up of sisters Bianca and Sierra) has milked for years is an incestuous, lesbian subtext.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a fitting backdrop for the low-fi, rural feel of their debut. 8-bit samples of farm animals and tinny, listless, bluesy guitar back cabaret vocals positioned somewhere between <strong>Björk</strong> and <strong>Billie Holiday</strong>. Imagine if the film <em><strong>Sister My Sister </strong></em>had been set in the American South, this would be an almost perfect soundtrack.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a balanced work though. An eerie melancholy does permeate the entire album but without the mood ever descending into complete darkness. The creepier moments are tempered by others of near-spiritual light.</p>
<p>Though the follow-up <strong><em>Noah&#8217;s Ark </em></strong>built on this fertile vein, the duo would later steer their music—with the help of Björk collaborator, <strong>Valgeir Sigurðsson</strong>—towards pop and club music with the 2007 album <em><strong>The Adventures of Ghosthorse and Stillborn</strong>.</em> The experiment wasn&#8217;t as successful as hoped and it seems they&#8217;ve returned to their original path with their new album, <em>Grey Oceans</em>.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.coco-records.nl/catalog/images/188252.jpg" alt="" />It could be debated which was more cynical: the high-tech, relatively radio-friendly production on <em>Ghosthorse</em>, or the fact Grey <em>Oceans </em>opens with an 8-bit sample reminiscent of their debut. It&#8217;s almost too blatant a signal to fans saying, &#8220;Hey! We&#8217;re back.&#8221; But perhaps it was necessary to capture the haters&#8217; attention again (I&#8217;m looking at myself here).</p>
<p>Ultimately, it doesn&#8217;t matter because <em>Grey Oceans</em> carries on—almost seemlessly—where <em>Noah&#8217;s Ark</em>left off. Plus it does so progressively, adding more obvious electronic elements while retaining the feel of their earlier work. Ironically, the result it more akin to the music of Björk than their collaboration with Sigurðsson.</p>
<p>The duo&#8217;s songwriting, vocals and musicianship have all improved significantly which highlights just how much of a &#8220;debut&#8221; <em>La Maison</em> really was. Unlike on <em>Ghosthorse</em>, however, the technical improvements don&#8217;t impinge on the artistic side of the music. <em>Grey Oceans</em> might be more polished than their first two records, but it&#8217;s also as ramshackle and adventurous as well.</p>
<p>Sometime in the last three years the sisters learned how to grow on their strengths, letting them evolve organically, without forcing a reinvention. It&#8217;s what reviewers traditionally would call a  &#8221;more mature&#8221; record, but it&#8217;s one of those rare cases where it isn&#8217;t a back-handed compliment and a synonym for &#8220;boring&#8221;.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-29-cocorosie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 28 &#8211; Seefeel : Quique</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/bone-rolling-reviews-28-seefeel-quique/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/bone-rolling-reviews-28-seefeel-quique/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jakob from nerd hurdles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mr. dapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seefeel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shoegaze]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=4192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Roll: 3 – 4 – 17
Result: Quique (2-disc reissue) by Seefeel.

Few artists have ever achieved recreating the sound of time folding in upon itself—like a fluffy cotton towel buffeted on the line—quite as well as the UK band Seefeel did with their 1993 album, Quique.
Seefeel either had the distinct good fortune, or possible misfortune, to be lumped in with two popular [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR-NEWBANNER-1.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em><strong>Roll</strong>: <strong><span style="color: #000000;">3</span> – <span style="color: #000000;">4 </span>– </strong><strong><span style="color: #000000;">17<br />
</span>Result</strong>:</em> <span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Quique (2-disc reissue) </strong></span><em>by </em><strong><span style="color: #000000;">Seefeel</span></strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em>.</em></span></p>
<div>
<div><span style="color: #000000;">Few artists have ever achieved recreating the sound of time folding in upon itself—like a fluffy cotton towel buffeted on the line—quite as well as the UK band <strong>Seefeel</strong> did with their 1993 album, <strong><em>Quique</em>.</strong></span></div>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span id="more-4192"></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="color: #000000;"><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/B000003RW101LZZZZZZZ.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="225" /></span></span>Seefeel either had the distinct good fortune, or possible misfortune, to be lumped in with two popular movements of the  &#8217;90s music scene—<strong>shoegaze</strong> and <strong>ambient electronica</strong>. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Fortunate in that the music press wasted no time in praising their records as a mesmerizing manna from Heaven. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">They were also unfortunate since, despite making some of the best music in both genres, Seefeel didn&#8217;t seem to catch on with either audience. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Really, they didn&#8217;t seem to achieve much acceptance outside of a small group of introverted art school students who listened to their records on headphones by candlelight wondering if anything really meant <em>anything</em> if music this beautiful could make you feel so empty and alone.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">No, it&#8217;s certainly not an album which is going to be everyone&#8217;s milky, lukewarm cup of tea. <em>Quique</em>&#8217;s subtle, repetitive loops were perhaps too subtle and repetitive to capture and hold people&#8217;s attention. </span><span style="color: #000000;">Composed mainly of soft, shimmering layers of very short (one- or two-beat) samples and delay loops, many of the tracks call to mind the feel of minimalist composers such as <strong>Philip Glass</strong> or <strong>Terry Riley </strong>(the latter&#8217;s masterstroke, <em><strong>In C</strong>,</em> specifically) only propelled by dub-informed, ambient drum machine rhythms reminiscent of early <strong>Aphex Twin</strong>.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">So perhaps it was to be expected <em>Quique</em> would remain frustratingly out-of-print for nearly a decade. For fans it was a little baffling to watch what was surely a highwater mark album (on par with  <strong>My Bloody Valentine</strong>&#8217;s <em>Loveless</em>) fade quietly and politely into the woodwork of pop history. </span><span style="color: #000000;">The fact no one seemed to notice the album deserved to be reissued was most baffling of all. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">I</span><span style="color: #000000;">n 2007, this oversight was finally corrected with a 2-disc reissue including the usual array of b-sides, demos and remixes. The only real criticism one can level at the set is that if the compilers had included a third disc comprised of material from their (also out of print) early singles compilation, <em><strong>Polyfusia</strong></em>, it would have been an complete record of the group&#8217;s golden era and worth the additional cost.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">As it stands, this is merely as excellent a reissue of a five star album as you could reasonably hope for. Which is nothing to complain about at all.</span></p>
</div>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/bone-rolling-reviews-28-seefeel-quique/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 27 &#8211; M/A/R/R/S : Pump Up The Volume</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-27/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marrs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pump up the volume]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=4101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Roll: 2 – 6 – 17 
Result: Pump Up The Volume (3-track CDS) by M/A/R/R/S.

 
Colourbox were the 4AD band who weren&#8217;t Cocteau Twins, This Mortal Coil, Modern English, Pixies, Throwing Muses, Dead Can Dance or generally remembered for anything recorded under there own name. They were responsible, however, for the best UK dance track ever recorded: &#8220;Pump Up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR-NEWBANNER-1.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em><strong>Roll</strong>: <strong><span style="color: #000000;">2</span> – <span style="color: #000000;">6 </span>– <span style="color: #000000;">17 <br />
</span>Result</strong>:</em> <span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Pump Up The Volume (3-track CDS) </strong></span><em>by </em><strong><span style="color: #000000;">M/A/R/R/S</span></strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em>.</em></span></p>
<div>
<div><span style="color: #000000;"> </span></div>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Colourbox </strong>were the <strong>4AD</strong> band who weren&#8217;t <strong>Cocteau Twins</strong>, <strong>This Mortal Coil</strong>, <strong>Modern English</strong>, <strong>Pixies</strong>, <strong>Throwing Muses</strong>, <strong>Dead Can Dance</strong> or generally remembered for anything recorded under there own name. They were responsible, however, for the best UK dance track ever recorded: &#8220;<strong>Pump Up The Volume</strong>&#8220;.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span id="more-4101"></span></span></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/pump-up-volume-marrs-cd-cover-art.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="170" /><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>M/A/R/R/S</strong>was a proposed Colourbox / <strong>A.R. Kane</strong> collaboration which, once in the studio, turned out to look better on paper than in reality. The result was a split one-off double-A single. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">One side is, for all intents and purposes, the Colourbox side and sports &#8221;Pump Up The Volume&#8221;; the other is A.R. Kane&#8217;s &#8220;<strong>Anitina</strong>&#8220;—the song which isn&#8217;t &#8220;Pump Up The Volume&#8221;. Though fine in most respects, it really should have been omitted in favour of another remix of the PUTV.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">In preparation for this review, I&#8217;ve listened to the track a half-dozen times (more than I ever have in the past) and all my memory can retain of it is the unfortunate drum programming. The song&#8217;s forget-ability is emphasized even more when placed next to a <em>tour de force</em> like &#8220;Pump Up The effin&#8217; Volume&#8221;.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Probably still the best UK House track ever produced, the importance of PUTV to the world of electronic music cannot be overstated. Whether House and Techno would have remained an underground phenomenon or not without the massive success of this single is impossible to say, but it was M/A/R/R/S who launched electronic music into the North American suburbs.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">In 1987  &#8220;electronic dance music&#8221; was a collection of three dirty words. Together they were synonymous with Disco and New Wave, two movements people at the time were scrambling to pretend they&#8217;d never enjoyed. But then M/A/R/R/S came along, seemingly out of nowhere, and changed the game. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Lured in with a dexterous display of impossibly catchy samples, people who&#8217;d previously scoffed at anything with an 808 drum beat started bobbing their heads. Tapes were passed around by kids who had siblings in college whose roommates were dubbing them stuff from Belgium and Germany which was &#8220;even better than M/A/R/R/S.&#8221; It usually wasn&#8217;t nearly as good but overnight there was a hunger for hypnotic four-on-the-floor beats with crazy movie sound-bites and hip-hop samples. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">M/A/R/R/S are often credited as being responsible for the Acid House craze (which gave birth to rave culture) in the UK that ended the decade, but in North America the benefactors of the PUTV legacy were probably the harder-edged Industrial bands. <strong>Ministry</strong>, <strong>Nine Inch Nails</strong> and the <strong>Wax Trax!</strong> label owe a debt of gratitude for having the public mind opened towards electronic beats and cut-up samples. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"> As the Electronica fad engulfed the mid-to-late &#8217;90s, PUTV&#8217;s influence could still be heard in nearly every track. Though not the first song to use samples in a cut-up montage of pop-culture referencing mayhem and dance-floor decadence, it was the de facto template. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Sounding miraculously timeless instead of dated, it remains the template a whopping 23 three years later. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"> </span><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="640" height="505" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/eGPhUr-T6UM&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="505" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/eGPhUr-T6UM&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object></p>
</div>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 26 &#8211; The Cure: Three Imaginary Boys (2-disc)</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-26/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-26/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-disc reissue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jakob nerd hurdles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the cure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three imaginary boys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=4042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.
Roll: 1 – 9– 16 Result: Three Imaginary Boys by The Cure.

 
There was a point in the mid-Eighties when The Cure&#8217;s UK debut album, Three Imaginary Boys, was a bit of a Holy Grail for North American fans. Not that it was utterly impossible to acquire, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR_banner2.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="81" /><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em>Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.<br />
Roll: <strong><span style="color: #000000;">1</span> – <span style="color: #000000;">9</span>– <span style="color: #000000;">16 </span></strong>Result:</em> <span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Three Imaginary Boys</strong></span> <em>by</em> <strong><span style="color: #000000;">The Cure</span></strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em>.</em></span></p>
<div>
<div><span style="color: #000000;"> </span></div>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">There was a point in the mid-Eighties when <strong>The Cure</strong>&#8217;s UK debut album, <em><strong>Three Imaginary Boys</strong></em>, was a bit of a Holy Grail for North American fans. Not that it was utterly impossible to acquire, it just tended to be pricey. But it had a handful of tracks not available on their North American debut, <em>Boys Don&#8217;t Cry,</em> and in the days before iTunes and file-sharing that meant finding a friend who&#8217;d actually paid two or three times regular price just to hear them. General consensus was the friend who&#8217;d splurged on the over-priced import had taken a bullet for you. <em>Boys Don&#8217;t Cry</em> really is the better album and no one ever needs to endure all 53 seconds of &#8220;The Weedy Burton&#8221;.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span id="more-4042"></span></span></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/Three.jpg" alt="" width="320" height="320" /><span style="color: #000000;">Yet there really is a charm <em>Three Imaginary Boys</em> holds that its appended American counterpart lacks. Not only is the iconic cover art far superior, for all it&#8217;s warts and missteps (&#8220;Foxy Lady&#8221;) the original album flows much better. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">It might lack the stellar singles off <em>Boys Don&#8217;t Cry </em>(&#8220;Jumping Someone Else&#8217;s Train&#8221; and the title track) but from start to finish there&#8217;s an amateurish, punky exuberance which isn&#8217;t interrupted by the slightly more polished later recordings. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Even coloured hot pink, with the psychedelic-surf/mod-punk being still miles away from the proto-goth of their next three albums, <em>Three Imaginary Boys</em> just feels darker and a touch more dangerous. </span><span style="color: #000000;">Still, songs like &#8220;Meathook&#8221; and &#8220;It&#8217;s Not You&#8221; are no replacement for the later album&#8217;s gems (including their incendiary seminal single &#8220;Killing An Arab&#8221;).</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Hopes were that the 2-disc reissue was going to be the best of both worlds, bringing all the tracks spread over the two albums together at last. But like all of The Cure reissues in this series, it&#8217;s instead somewhat of an exercise in frustration. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Made up of a bounty of live bootlegs, home demos and studio recordings, it technically <em>is </em>a treasure trove of delights. Unfortunately, the bonus material is (dis)organized with the finesse of a meerkat strung-out on Redbull and Twinkies.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Compilers of discs such as these generally sequence the material in a logical progression. Usually the logic is to flow from the hi-fidelity big studio b-sides to smaller studio demos and then the atrociously unlistenable curiosities even hardcore fans will only listen to once. </span><span style="color: #000000;">No so here. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">&#8220;Heroin Face&#8221; might be an interesting rarity if not for the ear-raping bootleg sound quality—made all the more apparent by being wedged in between perfectly fine studio demos of &#8220;I&#8217;m Cold&#8221; and &#8220;I Just Need Myself&#8221;. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Similarly, the <em>Boys Don&#8217;t Cry</em> songs are lumped in near the end of the disc when they should have been front and center along with the <strong>shamefully</strong> <strong>omitted </strong>&#8220;Killing An Arab&#8221; and &#8220;Plastic Passion&#8221;. The lack of those two tracks has to be the biggest criticism of the set and, ultimately, makes the whole thing pointless as a definitive document of this point in The Cure&#8217;s history. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Instead we&#8217;re treated to some unforgivingly lo-fi home demos—the only interesting (and listenable) of which is a slowed down, organ-based version of &#8220;10:15 Saturday Night—and four utterly painful live recordings.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">There <em>are </em>plenty of high points to the set. The studio demos of &#8220;Fire in Cairo&#8221;, &#8220;It&#8217;s Not You&#8221; and &#8220;10:15 Saturday Night&#8221;  improve upon the album versions. &#8220;Winter&#8221; is an interesting nod towards the gothier direction the band would later become synonymous with. The previously unissued &#8220;Faded Smiles&#8221; and &#8220;Play With Me&#8221; are both such excellent blasts of cheeky punk rock it begs the question why they hadn&#8217;t been issued as b-sides at the time. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">And, of course, many of the criticisms above can be remedied with a judicious use of iTunes<em> </em>to fix the sequencing (especially the completely overkill <em>four </em>appearances of &#8220;10:15 Saturday Night&#8221;). Still, though any fans buying this extended edition probably have the two AWOL tracks on other discs, one does wonder if they were omitted in order to encourage a purchase of the <em>Connect The Dots</em> b-sides box set—necessary anyway since those b-sides are missing from the reissues of their counterpart albums! <em>Ooooh, Robert Smith!</em> [shakes fist].</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"> </span></p>
</div>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-26/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 25 &#8211; Platinum Blonde: Standing in the Dark</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-25/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-25/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alien shores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billy idol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[it doesn't really matter video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LG73]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loverboy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark holmes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not in love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platinum blonde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sergio galli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standing in the dark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=3922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.
Today&#8217;s roll: 3 – 2– 5
Result: Standing In The Dark by Platinum Blonde.

 
This isn&#8217;t the first time I&#8217;ve written about this album, which might make me the preeminent Standing in the Dark scholar working today. That&#8217;s probably a fairly accurate statement since image searching [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR_banner2.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="81" /><span style="color: #ff0000"><em>Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.<br />
Today&#8217;s roll: <strong><span style="color: #000000">3</span> – <span style="color: #000000">2</span>– <span style="color: #000000">5<br />
</span></strong>Result:</em> <span style="color: #000000"><strong>Standing In The Dark</strong></span><strong> </strong><em>by</em> <strong><span style="color: #000000">Platinum </span></strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000"><strong><span style="color: #000000">Blonde</span></strong><em>.</em></span></p>
<div>
<div><span style="color: #000000"> </span></div>
<p><span style="color: #000000">This isn&#8217;t the first time I&#8217;ve <a href="http://wp.me/pvbja-8F" target="_blank"><strong>written about this album</strong></a>, which might make me the preeminent <em><strong>Standing in the Dark</strong></em> scholar working today. That&#8217;s probably a fairly accurate statement since image searching <strong>Platinum Blonde </strong>brings up fewer and fewer results for the band every year. Once the biggest Canadian pop-rock act working, the group is almost forgotten and, for the most part, rightfully so. Their 2nd and 3rd albums were exercises in rapidly diminishing returns, but for their debut album to be swept under the rug as well&#8230; well, that&#8217;s a crime against Canadian culture.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000"><span id="more-3922"></span></span><br />
<img class="alignleft" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_tRg73iZIquM/SoYGgje1dFI/AAAAAAAAc7Q/rh0HjMTFEFY/s320/Platinum+Blonde+standing+in+the+dark.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>In the 80s a DJ on Vancouver&#8217;s top-40 hit machine <strong>LG73</strong> said it best: &#8220;<em>Wheee-hay! If you&#8217;ve seen their videos, you know these guys were born to be rock stars! Here&#8217;s Platinum Blonde on all-hit LG73!</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m paraphrasing slightly, but that was the gist. And like all profound truisms, it stuck with me throughout my life and provided me guidance in dark times. Whenever I felt like I&#8217;d lost my way, all I needed to remember was <strong>Mark Holmes</strong> + <strong>Sergio Galli</strong> + <strong>Chris Steffler</strong> + <strong>Aquanet</strong> + <strong>tight red pants</strong> + <strong>dramatic lighting</strong> + <strong>blush and eyeshadow</strong> + <strong>a kick-ass power trio</strong> = <strong>Rock&#8217;n'Roll</strong>.</p>
<p>If all you know (or remember) of Platinum Blonde is material from their mega-hit sophomore release, <em><strong>Alien Shores</strong></em>, that statement could only seem, frankly, absurd. The hits from that album &#8220;<strong>Crying Over You</strong>&#8221; and &#8220;<strong>Somebody Somewhere</strong>&#8221; were the worst possible blend of top-40 pop and middle-of-the-road Canadian rock and were the antithesis of their debut. </p>
<p><em>Standing in the Dark</em> is an entirely different animal. At its heart, it&#8217;s just a pop album. In fact it&#8217;s a top-40 pop album <em>very much</em> of its era (1983). But it&#8217;s also a thumping post-punk album. And a balls-out rock album. And, in spite of being somewhat of an amalgam of a handful of obvious contemporary influences (<strong>The Police, Billy Idol</strong>, <strong>Duran Duran</strong>), it&#8217;s somehow unique and original. There are plenty of new wave records from the early &#8217;80s which sound like carbon copies of each other, but none of them sound exactly like <em>Standing in the Dark</em>.</p>
<p>This is due to (unlike with the overly produced and session-musician plagued follow-up) the fact that it&#8217;s the creation of tight, balanced power trio (guided by <strong>Split Enz</strong> producer, <strong>David Tickle</strong>). Like all great bands, Holmes, Galli and Steffler add up to a whole greater than their sum.</p>
<p>The rhythm section of Holmes (bass) and Steffler (drums) lock into punk/funk grooves that thump out of your sound system. New wave records have a tendency to dial back the attack, this one pushes it forward. Steffler had a knack for using electronic drums to their full advantage—playing to their strengths instead of using them as a cheap techno-gimmick. Holmes&#8217; basslines are economical but solid as a freight-train with just the right blend of funk and rock.</p>
<p>Over top of this textbook-perfect rhythm base, is Galli&#8217;s criminally under-rated guitar work. One of the most unique guitarists ever produced by the great white north, he displays his signature arpeggiated style on <em>Standing in the Dark </em>which was later, bogglingly, completely abandoned by the band.</p>
<p>Though clearly influenced by the likes of <strong>Andy Summers</strong>, <strong>The Edge</strong> and <strong>Steve Stevens</strong>, what set his sound apart from his contemporaries was his ability to combine the delicate, counterpoint melodies of minimalist new wave and post-punk players with a straight-ahead rock crunch of an LA hair metal band. Not a balancing act easily accomplished, yet he did it while retaining the best parts of both schools and discarding the weaknesses. Though it&#8217;s easy to say &#8220;Yeah, that&#8217;s just typical &#8217;80s guitar playing&#8221; when you hear it, it&#8217;s really something more. It&#8217;s perfectly quintessential 80s guitar playing with every note working in sync with his two band mates.</p>
<p>If nothing else, <em>Standing in the Dark </em>is a testament to a trio working in perfect synergy, appealing to pop and rock audiences simultaneously. This is really put into focus with the aforementioned sophomore release, <em>Alien Shores</em>. Instead of allowing the trio&#8217;s musical chemistry to evolve (the way U2&#8217;s or The Police&#8217;s did), they essentially broke up the band. Bassist <strong>Kenny McClean</strong> came on board seemingly so Holmes could prance around the stage more as a front-man. The adventurous, punky side of their sound was abandoned in favour of safe, calculated pop-rock and their musical personalities were all but erased.</p>
<p>I could wax poetic about the virtues of tracks like &#8220;<strong>Not In Love</strong>&#8221; and &#8220;<strong>Take It From Me</strong>&#8221; but all you really need to know about Platinum Blonde and <em>Standing in the Dark</em> is in this video for &#8220;<a href="http://www.simplysyndicated.com//www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4SOnBDe7qs" target="_blank"><strong>It Doesn&#8217;t Really Matter</strong></a>&#8220;. It&#8217;s not going to be for everyone, but for fans of &#8217;80s glam painted with the broadest of strokes, it doesn&#8217;t get any better than this. And, to some of us, it still really <em>does</em> matter.</p>
</div>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-25/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mighty Mighty Bosstones Interview</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/mmbinterview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/mmbinterview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 22:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[album]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnny vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mighty mighty bosstones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pin points and gin joints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=3849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.simplysyndicated.com/wp-content/themes/v1/avatars/srmusic80.gif" width="80" height="80" alt="mighty-mighty-bosstones-interview" />
The Mighty Mighty Bosstones are best known to the masses for their 1997 hit, &#8220;The Impression That I Get,&#8221; (also known to many as the &#8216;Knock On Wood&#8217; song), from their platinum album &#8220;Let&#8217;s Face It.&#8221;  You younger kids may know them from their song &#8220;Where&#8217;d You Go?&#8221; in Rock Band 2, or their cameo [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.simplysyndicated.com/wp-content/themes/v1/avatars/srmusic80.gif" width="80" height="80" alt="mighty-mighty-bosstones-interview" />
<p style="text-align: left">The Mighty Mighty Bosstones are best known to the masses for their 1997 hit, &#8220;The Impression That I Get,&#8221; (also known to many as the &#8216;Knock On Wood&#8217; song), from their platinum album &#8220;Let&#8217;s Face It.&#8221;  You younger kids may know them from their song &#8220;Where&#8217;d You Go?&#8221; in Rock Band 2, or their cameo as the band playing in <em>Clueless</em>.  However you may know them, or even if you don&#8217;t, you should know that they have a new album out called &#8220;Pin Points &amp; Gin Joints,&#8221; which reflects the band&#8217;s progression from young kids melding ska and hardcore in the 80&#8217;s Boston music scene, to their current status as grownups who still have the passion to put together an album despite being a part-time band, being scattered around the country, and holding down other jobs, like frontman Dicky Barrett&#8217;s current gig as announcer for late night talk show Jimmy Kimmel Live.  I had the chance to reconnect with saxophonist and original member Tim &#8220;Johnny Vegas&#8221; Burton, who I haven&#8217;t spoken to since the heyday of ska music in the late 90&#8217;s, when I hosted a ska and punk rock radio show in New York.  We talk about the current state of the band, future plans, and cover the <a href="http://www.Gunaxin.com" target="_blank">Gunaxin.com</a> 6 questions.  Check out the band and their new album at <a href="http://www.BosstonesMusic.com">www.BosstonesMusic.com</a>.  Yes, I know this is Simply READ, but here is a special MP3 interview not available on our show feed, so Simply Listen.  (WARNING- Audio is not the best due to circumstances beyond my control.)</p>
<p style="text-align: left">
<p style="text-align: left"><a href="http://bosstonesmusic.com/store.html"><img class="alignnone" src="http://i653.photobucket.com/albums/uu259/mastersofnone/bosstonesnew.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="240" /></a><img class="alignnone" src="http://i653.photobucket.com/albums/uu259/mastersofnone/mightymightybosstones.jpg" alt="" width="320" height="249" />Posted by Jay from the <a href="http://www.mastersofnoneshow.com" target="_blank">Masters Of None podcast</a>.  Follow Jay on <a href="http://twitter.com/mastersofnone">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/mmbinterview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.libsyn.com/media/mastersofnone/TimBurtonInterview.mp3" length="10084616" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>album,interview,johnny vegas,mighty mighty bosstones,pin points and gin joints,ska,tim burton</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>The Mighty Mighty Bosstones are best known to the masses for their 1997 hit, &quot;The Impression That I Get,&quot; (also known to many as the &#039;Knock On Wood&#039; song), from their platinum album &quot;Let&#039;s Face It.&quot;  You younger kids may know them from their song &quot;Wher...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>The Mighty Mighty Bosstones are best known to the masses for their 1997 hit, &quot;The Impression That I Get,&quot; (also known to many as the &#039;Knock On Wood&#039; song), from their platinum album &quot;Let&#039;s Face It.&quot;  You younger kids may know them from their song &quot;Where&#039;d You Go?&quot; in Rock Band 2, or their cameo as the band playing in Clueless.  However you may know them, or even if you don&#039;t, you should know that they have a new album out called &quot;Pin Points &amp; Gin Joints,&quot; which reflects the band&#039;s progression from young kids melding ska and hardcore in the 80&#039;s Boston music scene, to their current status as grownups who still have the passion to put together an album despite being a part-time band, being scattered around the country, and holding down other jobs, like frontman Dicky Barrett&#039;s current gig as announcer for late night talk show Jimmy Kimmel Live.  I had the chance to reconnect with saxophonist and original member Tim &quot;Johnny Vegas&quot; Burton, who I haven&#039;t spoken to since the heyday of ska music in the late 90&#039;s, when I hosted a ska and punk rock radio show in New York.  We talk about the current state of the band, future plans, and cover the Gunaxin.com (http://www.Gunaxin.com) 6 questions.  Check out the band and their new album at www.BosstonesMusic.com (http://www.BosstonesMusic.com).  Yes, I know this is Simply READ, but here is a special MP3 interview not available on our show feed, so Simply Listen.  (WARNING- Audio is not the best due to circumstances beyond my control.)

(http://i653.photobucket.com/albums/uu259/mastersofnone/bosstonesnew.jpg)(http://i653.photobucket.com/albums/uu259/mastersofnone/mightymightybosstones.jpg)Posted by Jay from the Masters Of None podcast (http://www.mastersofnoneshow.com).  Follow Jay on Twitter (http://twitter.com/mastersofnone).</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Simply Syndicated</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>28:00</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 24 &#8211; Coil: Horse Rotor Vator</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-24/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-24/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dead can dance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horse rotor vator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jakob from nerd hurdles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[love's secret domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skinny puppy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=3800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.
Today&#8217;s roll: 1 – 7– 9.
Result: Horse Rotor Vator by Coil.

 
Sometimes it&#8217;s hard to write objectively about certain bands or albums. Coil were such an important part of my life for so long, they&#8217;re beyond criticism. Whatever might be good or bad about their music, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR_banner2.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="81" /><span style="color: #ff0000"><em>Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.<br />
Today&#8217;s roll: <strong><span style="color: #000000">1</span> – <span style="color: #000000">7</span>– <span style="color: #000000">9</span></strong>.<br />
Result:</em> <span style="color: #000000"><strong>Horse Rotor Vator</strong></span><strong> </strong><em>by</em> <strong><span style="color: #000000">Coil</span></strong><em>.</em></span></p>
<div>
<div><span style="color: #000000"> </span></div>
<p><span style="color: #000000">Sometimes it&#8217;s hard to write objectively about certain bands or albums. <strong>Coil</strong> were such an important part of my life for so long, they&#8217;re beyond criticism. Whatever might be good or bad about their music, it just <em>is. </em>And that&#8217;s fine unless you&#8217;re trying to write a review about their 1986 sophomore album, <em><strong>Horse Rotor Vator</strong>.</em></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000"><span id="more-3800"></span><em> </em></span></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" style="border: black 1px solid" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/814569.jpg" alt="" width="280" height="280" /><span style="color: #000000">I was a little apprehensive to take this album on. Having discovered Coil in 1991 with their magnum opus of sex, drugs and pagan magic, <em><strong>Love&#8217;s Secret Domain</strong></em>, I&#8217;ve always tended to listen to that album onwards as opposed to delving heavily into their back-catalogue—though I hunted it all down like religious relics. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">I actually own <em>Horse Rotor Vator</em> on both CD and vinyl, but I&#8217;ve probably only listened to the album a half-dozen times over many years. </span><span style="color: #000000">So it was that my memories were a little hazy and I felt there was a real potential the album might be a terrible cheese-fest. </span><span style="color: #000000">It turns out it toes the line of cheese without planting a foot firmly in the ricotta. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">That&#8217;s a purely subjective call, of course. Certain listeners might find the album embarrassingly cringy. Though a lot of timeless orchestral samples are employed, the keyboards and drum machines your hear are, of course, rooted in the synth-pop/EBM/electro-industrial of the early-to-mid 80s. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">Also, the allusions to classic mythology and the heavy, medieval musical motifs (reminiscent of early <strong>Dead Can Dance</strong>) could be the very definition of cheese to some. I have to admit the heavy-handedness of select tracks from their early work has always kept me at bay a little. Yet, like Dead Can Dance, they generally manage to pull it off with enough theatrical panache to make it magical, but with enough restraint to keep it from becoming clownish buffoonery.</span>
<div>One thing Coil always did well, from the time of their first single, was not to pull any punches. Right up until the band&#8217;s final days (with the death of <strong>John Balance</strong> in 2004), there was always the sense they didn&#8217;t just turn corners others might have stopped short of, they weren&#8217;t even aware the corners existed. They managed to create a creepy sense of true menace which makes similarly dark acts like <strong>Skinny Puppy</strong> look and sound as silly as <strong>Kiss</strong>.</div>
<p><div>This is due, somewhat ironically, to the life and joy they inject into their music. When they evoke dark pagan sex magic it&#8217;s not the pantomime doom and gloom of a <strong>Norwegian death metal</strong> band, it&#8217;s a real celebration.</div>
<p><div>Ultimately, <em>Horse Rotor Vator</em> holds more value as a stepping stone towards the perfection of <em>Love&#8217;s Secret Domain </em>than as an album to be enjoyed on its own merits. Though anyone interested in uncompromizing, adventurous music would do well to pick up any album by the band. Including this one.</div>
</div>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-24/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 23 &#8211; Black Power Music of a Revolution: Various</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-23/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-23/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black powe music of a revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bone rolling reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jakob nerd hurdles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=3735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.
Today&#8217;s roll: 4 – 4 – 10.
Result: Black Power: Music of a Revolution by Various Artists.

 
There are a lot of great compilations of soul, funk and R&#38;B from the &#8220;superfly&#8221; era (roughly 1968-1974) but there aren&#8217;t too many worth hanging on to beyond the rip to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR_banner2.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="81" /><span style="color: #ff0000"><em>Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.<br />
Today&#8217;s roll: <strong><span style="color: #000000">4</span> – <span style="color: #000000">4</span> – <span style="color: #000000">10</span></strong>.<br />
Result:</em> <span style="color: #000000"><strong>Black Power: Music of a Revolution</strong></span><strong> </strong><em>by</em> <strong><span style="color: #000000">Various Artists</span></strong><em>.</em></span></p>
<div>
<div><span style="color: #000000"> </span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000">There are a lot of great compilations of soul, funk and R&amp;B from the &#8220;superfly&#8221; era (roughly 1968-1974) but there aren&#8217;t too many worth hanging on to beyond the rip to MP3. <em><strong>Black Power: Music of a Revolution</strong></em> has kept its place on my shelves because it transcends merely collecting a bunch of songs onto a pair of foil discs,  it tells a story. </span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000"> </span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000"><span id="more-3735"></span></span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000"> </span></div>
<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/1548374.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<div><span style="color: #000000">Taking  a page from <strong>Tarantino</strong> movie soundtracks, the songs on <em>Black Power</em> are interspersed with clips of speeches from black activists <strong>Huey Newton</strong>, <strong>Kathleen Cleaver</strong>, <strong>Stokely Carmichael</strong> and <strong>Malcolm X</strong>. The effect is almost like listening to an <strong>NPR</strong> audio-documentary about the times. The clips illuminate the songs, putting them in context and bringing to life the time and place the artists were singing from. The picture painted might be a bit of a romanticized caricature, but it makes for a great mythology and a more fulfilling listening experience.</span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000"> </span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000">But even setting the gimmick aside, these two discs are about as solid a set of gritty, bass-heavy, badass soul and funk grooves as you&#8217;re going to find. These types of collections recycle a lot of the same titles, but you&#8217;ll find many of the essentials are here. From the bombast of &#8220;<strong>Say It Loud — I&#8217;m Black and I&#8217;m Proud</strong>&#8221; by <strong>James Brown</strong> to the psychedelic soul of  &#8221;<strong>Message From a Black Man</strong>&#8221; by <strong>The Temptations</strong> to the <strong>Isley Brothers&#8217;</strong> classic call to arms &#8221;<strong>Fight The Power</strong>&#8221; and <strong>William DeVaughn</strong>&#8217;s smooth ghetto philosophy on &#8220;<strong>Be Thankful For What You Got</strong>&#8220;,  the set rarely misses a beat. </span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000"> </span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000">Because of the compilation&#8217;s &#8220;black power&#8221; slant, all the songs have a political element. You won&#8217;t find a lot of the  classic pimp epics (like &#8220;<strong>Superfly</strong>&#8220;) found on other comps, but you<em> will </em>find handful of tracks usually passed over by the more blaxploiation oriented collections. The unforgiving &#8220;<strong>The Revolution Will Not Be Televised</strong>&#8221; by <strong>Gil Scott-Heron</strong> is followed by <strong>The Last Poet</strong>&#8217;s equally unforgiving  &#8221;<strong>When the Revolution Comes</strong>&#8221; on disc two. Later on, jazz singer <strong>Nina Simone</strong> makes an appearance with her anthem &#8221;<strong>To Be Young, Gifted and Black</strong>&#8220;. </span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000"> </span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000">One of the reasons the compilation works so well is the subject matter keeps it rooted in the 1968-1974 time frame, really the golden age for funk and soul. There&#8217;s a raw hungriness to these tracks which funk finds missing as it stretches into the 70s towards the slickness of disco. </span><span style="color: #000000">The few instances the album takes a misstep is when it reaches past the &#8216;74 deadline with tracks like <strong>Parliament</strong>&#8217;s 1977 &#8220;<strong>Chocolate City</strong>&#8220;. Though the song fits thematically, it doesn&#8217;t hold the same angry fire as the rest of the songs and another visceral soundbite from Huey Newton might have been a better choice.</span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000"> </span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000">You shouldn&#8217;t walk away from this review thinking the album is all dire piss and vinegar about being oppressed. Even the angriest songs would play well at a dance party. &#8220;<strong>Express Yourself</strong>&#8221; by <strong>The Watts 103rd St. Band </strong> is a perfectly possitive jam (even if it gets sampled by <strong>N.W.A.</strong> 17 years later) and no one ever really listens to what <strong>Earth, Wind and Fire </strong>are singing, they just want to feel that rhythm section pumping.</span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000"> </span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000"><strong><em>Black Power</em></strong> is on of those rare compilations. It works as solid entertainment and as something more<em>—</em>an historic document of a fascinating era in the popular mythology of late 20th century America.</span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000"> </span></div>
</div>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-23/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 22 &#8211; Run-DMC: Back From Hell</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-22/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-22/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1d20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1d4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[back from hell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bone rolling reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d&d disce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice cube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jakob from nerd hurdles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ll cool j]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nwa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old school hip-hop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public enemy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[run-dmc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=3658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.
Today&#8217;s roll: 4 – 12 – 10.
Result: Back From Hell by Run-DMC.

 
Hindsight can sometimes look kinder on an album than first blush. Conventional wisdom would have you believe Run-DMC&#8217;s fifth album, Back From Hell, is a disappointment. But what might have sounded like band-wagon jumping in 1990—their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR_banner2.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="81" /><span style="color: #ff0000"><em>Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.<br />
Today&#8217;s roll: <strong><span style="color: #000000">4</span> – <span style="color: #000000">12</span> – <span style="color: #000000">10</span></strong>.<br />
Result:</em> <span style="color: #000000"><strong>Back From Hell</strong></span><strong> </strong><em>by</em> <strong><span style="color: #000000">Run-DMC</span></strong><em>.</em></span></p>
<div>
<div><span style="color: #000000"> </span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000">Hindsight can sometimes look kinder on an album than first blush. Conventional wisdom would have you believe <strong>Run-DMC</strong>&#8217;s fifth album, <em><strong>Back From Hell</strong></em>, is a disappointment. But what might have sounded like band-wagon jumping in 1990—their shameless embrace of the era&#8217;s flavour-of-the-week hard-funk and R&amp;B samples—no longer comes off as scrambling to keep up with currents trends. Instead it indicates they&#8217;d remained masters long after they&#8217;d brought hip-hop to a mainstream audience.</span></div>
<div>
<p><span style="color: #000000"> </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000"><span id="more-3658"></span></span></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" style="border: black 1px solid" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/B00000J7IY03LZZZZZZZ.jpg" alt="run-dm back from hell" width="300" height="300" /><span style="color: #000000">True, <em>Back From Hell</em> is the first Run-DMC disc which wasn&#8217;t instantly recognizable as the seminal hip-hop crew, but it would have been a mistake to stick with the signature cavernous mid-tempo rock beats, guitar riffs and minimalist scratching of <em><strong>King of Rock</strong></em>, <strong><em>Raising Hell</em></strong> and <strong><em>Tougher Than Leather</em></strong>. Classic albums all, but already sounding dated by the time 1990 rolled around.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">The hip-hop game had already been changed by renegades like <strong>Public Enemy </strong>and even pop-stars <strong>Beastie Boys—</strong>the <strong>Beatles </strong>to Run-DMC&#8217;s <strong>Beach Boys</strong> on the charts in 1986—had laid the old-school to rest with <em><strong>Paul&#8217;s Boutique</strong></em>. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">Having taken flack from the hip-hop community for selling-out with &#8221;<strong>Walk This Way</strong>&#8220;, Run-DMC played it safe with <em>Tougher Than Leather. </em>As much a classic old-school platter designed for hardcore hip-hop fans as you&#8217;d see released in 1988, Run-DMC still had the carpet pulled out from under them by everyone from <strong>Ice-T</strong> and <strong>N.W.A</strong> (for street cred) to <strong>LL Cool J</strong> and <strong>MC Hammer</strong> (on the </span><span style="color: #000000">commercial front).</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">The Kings of Rock were finding themselves outstripped on all sides and did what any streetwise veterans would do. They retooled their attack and they did it magnificently. Raw, slinky and vicious cuts like &#8220;<strong>The Ave</strong>&#8220;, &#8220;<strong>Bob Your Head</strong>&#8220;, &#8220;<strong>Word is Born</strong>&#8221; all crank the same dirty funk samples fueling <strong>Cool J</strong>&#8217;s and <strong>PE</strong>&#8217;s best work and their vocal attack is on point. They&#8217;d upped their game and moved past their classic &#8221;eeny-meeny-miny-moe&#8221; rhymes and cadence to be able to stand toe-to-toe against any rapper working.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">It didn&#8217;t work though. What deserved to be recognised as a <em>tour de force</em> at the mic and behind the wheels, was either dismissed as an insincere attempt at relevance by dinosaurs or, to a certain extent, simply ignored. The hardcore hip-hop fans called it derivative, the suburban kids wanted more duets with <strong>Aerosmith</strong>.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">And fair enough, their adoption of current hip-hop trends was a little like when <strong>Rolling Stones</strong> went disco. Twenty years on, it sounds less contrived and more of a natural evolution. Sometimes it takes that kind of distance to see the how an artist&#8217;s career evolves clearly. The problem with evolution, though, is is survival of the fittest. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">As much as Run-DMC adapted, their one-time chart rivals Beastie Boys would soon blow them out of the water artistically by picking up their own instruments on <strong><em>Check Your Head</em>,</strong> <strong>Ice Cube </strong>would make their street stories sound like fairy-tales and <strong>LL Cool J</strong>&#8217;s six-pack<strong> </strong>became a platinum-selling sex symbol that same year despite issuing the comparatively weak <strong><em>Mama Said Knock You Out</em>.</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">Taken on its own merits, separated from everything else that was going on, had come before and would come later, <em>Back From Hell </em>is as much a hip-hop masterpiece as the first four DMC discs. It might even be their best up to that date—at least one of their most enjoyable listens in 2010.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">Unfortunately, albums are rarely listened to on their own merits, separated from context, and <em>Back From Hell</em> will probably always be considered the first step in a steady decline for Run-DMC.</span></p>
</div>
</div>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-22/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 21 &#8211; Daniel Ash: Coming Down</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-21-daniel-ash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-21-daniel-ash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[album reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bone rolling reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coming down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daniel ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jakob from nerd hurdles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music revies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=3560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.
Today&#8217;s roll: 2 – 6 – 10.
Result: Coming Down by Daniel Ash.

 
 
I&#8217;m beginning to doubt the randomizing ability of my dice. If you&#8217;re an observant reader, you&#8217;ll notice today&#8217;s roll is only one digit off last week&#8217;s. You might also wonder—if you&#8217;re observant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR_banner2.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="81" /><span style="color: #ff0000"><em>Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.<br />
Today&#8217;s roll: <strong><span style="color: #000000">2</span> – <span style="color: #000000">6</span> – <span style="color: #000000">10</span></strong>.<br />
Result:</em> <span style="color: #000000"><strong>Coming Down</strong></span><strong> </strong><em>by</em> <strong><span style="color: #000000">Daniel Ash</span></strong><em>.</em></span></p>
<div>
<div><span style="color: #000000"> </span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000"> </span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000">I&#8217;m beginning to doubt the randomizing ability of my dice. If you&#8217;re an observant reader, you&#8217;ll notice today&#8217;s roll is only one digit off last week&#8217;s. You might also wonder—if you&#8217;re observant enough to surmise my CDs are catalogued in alphabetical order—why <strong>Daniel Ash</strong> is placed a mere four discs ahead of <strong>Magnetic Fields</strong> instead of in the A&#8217;s.</span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000"> </span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000">Well, dear observant reader, that would be because I sometimes file solo albums in with the artist’s main band. Especially if the album in question sounds almost exactly like their day job band. In this case that would be <strong>Love and Rockets </strong>and1991’s <em><strong>Coming Down </strong></em>does more or less does sound like the would-be follow-up to their eponymously titled 1989 album. Or, more accurately, the long awaited follow-up to <strong>Tones on Tail</strong>, his previous project with <strong>Bauhaus</strong>/Love and Rockets drummer, <strong>Kevin Haskins.</strong></span></div>
<div><span id="more-3560"></span></div>
<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/a08716.jpg" alt="Daniel Ash Coming Down velvet flock book" width="220" height="185" />Really, <em>Coming Down</em> plays just like a Love and Rockets record but with bassist/songwriting partner <strong>David J</strong> replaced by <strong>Natcha Atlas</strong>. As with many bands where the whole is greater than the sum of its parts, that&#8217;s not necessarily a good thing. The album really highlights what David J brings to the partnership as a vocalist, songwriter and bassist. The latter trait is emphasized most by the aping of his playing style on &#8220;<strong>Candy Darling</strong>&#8220;.</p>
<p>Atlas, of course, brings plenty to the table as a collaborator, but this is clearly very much Ash&#8217;s boat and he steers it through waters familiar to Rockets fans—glittering waves of <strong>Bolan</strong> and <strong>Bowie</strong> with a little of <strong>Jesus and Mary Chain</strong>&#8217;s North Sea squall. Here though, the waters seem a little shallow without another artistic vision to add depth. To be fair, David J&#8217;s solo albums from the same period tend to suffer the same fault (which is probably why the band reunited for another album in 1994).</p>
<p>The big college-radio hit off the album, &#8220;<strong>This Love</strong>&#8220;, sounds about as dated as a Madchester-informed alt-pop single from 1991 could sound. Kudos to him though, he managed to create a dead-on example of what <strong>Soup Dragons</strong> covering L&amp;R&#8217;s version of &#8220;<strong>Ball of Confusion</strong>&#8221; would have sounded like. That could be both a good or a bad thing, depending on where you stand. I stand on the &#8220;good&#8221; side of the fence.</p>
<p>I really can&#8217;t separate the nostalgic memories of blasting the extended version of this song  (off the <strong>cassingle</strong>) on my commute to painting class during my freshman year at college from the experience of listening to it now and trying to decided just how cheesy it really <em>must</em> be.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a underlying layer of cheese to the whole enterprise, actually. The cover of &#8220;<strong>Day Tripper</strong>&#8221; is atrocious and the synthesizers in the background of most of the tracks are a little to lush and &#8220;of the time&#8221;. Even the creepy psychedelia Ash spent a career perfecting just feels a little shark-jumped here—almost in the realm of parody.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s the bottom line on <em>Coming Down</em>. If you&#8217;re a Bauhaus/Rockets/Daniel Ash fan, it&#8217;s one of the better of his three solo albums. The production on the 1993 follow-up <em>Foolish Thing Desire</em> weathers better, but the songs are less catchy. His more recent eponymous album should be avoided, if not at all costs, at some costs. Perhaps bus fare to get as far away from the used CD store selling it as possible would be reasonable.</p>
<p>Fans looking to complete their Bauhaus/Love and Rockets collection, might want to hunt down the velvet-flocked book promotional version of <em>Coming Down</em> (pictured) to truly make it worth owning.</p>
</div>
<p><span style="color: #000000"> </span></p>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-21-daniel-ash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 20 &#8211; Magnetic Fields: i</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[album review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music reviw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen merritt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the magnetic fields]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=3445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.
Today&#8217;s roll: 2 – 6 – 14.
Result: i by The Magnetic Fields.
 
Last week The Magnetic Fields released an album, Realism, to almost universally &#8220;meh&#8221; reviews. Fitting, since it&#8217;s an almost universally meh album. It really highlights what&#8217;s been Stephen Merrit&#8217;s Achilles heel for a long time—his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="null"><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR_banner2.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="81" /></a><span style="color: #ff0000"><em>Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.<br />
Today&#8217;s roll: <strong><span style="color: #000000">2</span> – <span style="color: #000000">6</span> – <span style="color: #000000">14</span></strong>.<br />
Result:</em> <span style="color: #000000"><strong>i</strong></span><strong> </strong><em>by</em> <strong><span style="color: #000000">The Magnetic Fields</span></strong><em>.</em></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000"> <br />
Last week <strong>The Magnetic Fields</strong> released an album, <em><strong>Realism</strong></em>, to almost universally &#8220;meh&#8221; reviews. Fitting, since it&#8217;s an almost universally meh album. It really highlights what&#8217;s been <strong>Stephen Merrit</strong>&#8217;s Achilles heel for a long time—his voice. It&#8217;s just not a voice you can take seriously. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">This had been fine in the past since his career has been built on lyrics so firmly planted in cheek, he looks like he&#8217;s miming a blowjob. <em>Realism</em> strips away the humour and the wit, which leaves some pleasant but boring ditties with a voice suited better to musical comedy than popular song. It&#8217;</span><span style="color: #000000">s the kind of disappointing offering that might make one question Merritt&#8217;s reputation as one of the top songwriters of his generation. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">The last album of his to geniunely back-up that reputation up was probably 2004&#8217;s elegantly titled,<em><strong> i</strong></em>.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000"><span id="more-3445"></span></span></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" style="border: black 1px solid" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/magneticfieldsi.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="224" /><span style="color: #000000">After an artist has released an almost universally acclaimed tour de force like the tripple-disc concept album <em><strong>69 Love Songs</strong></em>, what do they do to follow-up that accomplishment? Well, if <em>69 Love Songs</em> was indeed the album they were following, and the artist was Stephen Merritt, they might simply write another 14  love songs for an album that could almost be disc #4 of that set. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">The only thing that really sets <em>i</em> apart from <em>69 Love Songs</em> is its unique concept of each song&#8217;s title beginning with the letter &#8220;i&#8221;. Otherwise it really is just love songs 70 through 83. </span><span style="color: #000000">But don&#8217;t be put off by that. It&#8217;s a welcome thing. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">What made <em>69 Love Songs</em> great was Merritt&#8217;s wry, sarcastic take on the ironies of love and life. &#8220;<strong>I Don&#8217;t Believe You</strong>&#8220;, &#8220;<strong>I Wish I Had an Evil Twin</strong>&#8220;, &#8220;<strong>Is This What They Used To Call Love?</strong>&#8221; all tug at the heart strings while pulling the corners of your mouth upwards. As a single disc it might actually be a stronger album than any of the three <em>69 Love Songs </em>discs on their own, but in the production and performance Merritt is showing what might be a touch of boredom with himself and his schtick. Or perhaps it&#8217;s just a case of too many edges being polished off in the studio. Regardless, and issues of a slightly muted enthusiasm aside, this is the last time we hear him playing to his strengths on record.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">After this album Merritt focuses on increasingly eccentric side-projects (a <strong>Limony Snicket</strong> related <strong>Gothic Archies </strong>album and a fake Victorian vaudeville/opera under his own name) before returning to the Magnetic Fields with <em>Realism</em>&#8217;s predecessor, <strong><em>Distortion—</em></strong>an alleged tribute to noise-pop,<strong><em> </em></strong>which frankly sounds like the distortion was later added to the mix in an attempt to distract from the glaring lack of the brilliant songwriting expected from him. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">At his best Merritt is a sort of tin pan alley <strong>Leonard Cohen </strong>with a more focused and cutting sense of humour (no small feat!). Or perhaps he isn&#8217;t, really. Perhaps that&#8217;s just a character he plays on certain albums. Judging by his work since 2004, it&#8217;s a character he sadly retired after <em>i</em>. </span></p>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 19 &#8211; Hat City Intuitve/Rocks In My Pillow/Imp(s): Folk Waste 3</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-19-folk-waste-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-19-folk-waste-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[folk waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free-jazz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free-psyche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hat city intuitive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMP(s)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psyche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychedelic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rocks in my pillow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=3349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.
Today&#8217;s roll: 4 – 4 – 14.
Result: Folk Waste 3 by Various Artists.
 
This out-of-print, limited edition three-way split put out by micro-label Folk Waste features Hat City Intuitive, Rocks In My Pillow and Imp(s).  A fair introduction to this free-folk/free-jazz/free-noise  imprint, it&#8217;s a shame this material isn&#8217;t (yet?) available [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="null"><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR_banner2.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="81" /></a><span style="color: #ff0000"><em>Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.<br />
Today&#8217;s roll: <strong><span style="color: #000000">4</span> – <span style="color: #000000">4</span> – <span style="color: #000000">14</span></strong>.<br />
Result:</em> <span style="color: #000000"><strong>Folk Waste 3</strong></span><strong> </strong><em>by</em> <strong><span style="color: #000000">Various Artists</span></strong><em>.</em></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000"> </span></p>
<p>This out-of-print, limited edition three-way split put out by micro-label <a href="http://folkwaste.com" target="_blank"><strong>Folk Waste</strong></a> features <strong>Hat City Intuitive</strong>, <strong>Rocks In My Pillow</strong> and <strong>Imp(s)</strong>.  A fair introduction to this free-folk/free-jazz/free-noise  imprint, it&#8217;s a shame this material isn&#8217;t (yet?) available to a wider audience.</p>
<p><span id="more-3349"></span></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/IMG_5018.jpg" alt="" width="320" height="240" />The set opens with long-running free-jazz/improv unit <strong>Hat City Intuitive</strong> debasing dixieland with the upbeat, ramshackle mess of &#8220;<strong>Saint Marty D</strong>&#8221; before completely changing gears with &#8220;<strong>Newtown Etc to Greg</strong>&#8220;. The second track is as much wafty psychedelic exploration as the first is skronktastic jazz, yet Hat City manage a through-line between the two compositions. Perhaps the through-line is both would have been better off without the guitar. </p>
<p><strong>Rocks In My Pillow</strong>&#8217;s two contributions are simultaneously less engaging and more successful overall. Restrained in comparison to Hat City Intuitive&#8217;s unhinged free-for-all, their creepy soundscapes pack in a lot more atmosphere and considered playing. Almost like a soundtrack to an imaginary film about post-apocalyptic beatniks, these tracks come off a mellower, jazzier version of <strong>Godspeed! You Black Emperor</strong><em>. </em>Bowed instruments and minimalist percussion drift like a radioactive dust storm through an abandoned city. Not as immediate as their counterparts, but easily the best moments on the disc.</p>
<p><strong>IMP(s)</strong> finish off the set with &#8220;<strong>Open Space/Closed Space</strong>&#8220;. The five member collective check almost every box on the free-psyche checklist with this pairing. Bells, check. Plinky stringed instruments, check. Warbly vocals approximating all manner of ethic tradition, check. Yet unlike the contrived nature some acts in the scene check-off those boxes, IMP(s) do it with passion and authenticity. The twenty-four minute long &#8220;Closed Space&#8221; is, I suspect, a live recording of a performance and, though fantastic, was probably more successful seen as well as heard. Similar to the latter-day experimental and more theatrical work of <strong>Einsturzende Neubauten</strong>, there&#8217;s an element of theatre, spoken word performance, and chanted ceremony which feels merely hinted at on the recording. You get the feeling you&#8217;re only privy to half the picture here. It&#8217;s still a fascinating half and suggests IMP(s) are well worth experiencing live.</p>
<p>As I mentioned earlier, this split release is a fair introduction to the Folk Waste label. Fans of the above described sounds would find it well worth their while to check them out. And not delay since the extremely limited runs of their albums sell out very quickly.</p>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-19-folk-waste-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 18 &#8211; Teenage Fanclub: Bandwagonesque</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-18/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[90s alt-rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bandwagonesque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cd reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grunge reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jakob nerd hurdles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teenage fanclub]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=3316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.
Today&#8217;s roll: 4 – 2 – 3.
Result: Bandwagonesque by Teenage Fanclub.
 
Making good on the promises made by their debut, A Catholic Education, Teenage Fanclub created one of the few timeless classics of the 90s alt-rock heyday. Aptly—and cheekily—titled, Bandwagonesque has weathered better than many of its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="null"><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR_banner2.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="81" /></a><span style="color: #ff0000"><em>Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.<br />
Today&#8217;s roll: <strong><span style="color: #000000">4</span> – <span style="color: #000000">2</span> – <span style="color: #000000">3</span></strong>.<br />
Result:</em> <span style="color: #000000"><strong>Bandwagonesque</strong></span><strong> </strong><em>by</em> <strong><span style="color: #000000">Teenage Fanclub</span></strong><em>.</em></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000"> </span></p>
<p>Making good on the promises made by their debut, <em>A Catholic Education</em>, <strong>Teenage Fanclub</strong> created one of the few timeless classics of the 90s alt-rock heyday. Aptly—and cheekily—titled, <strong><em>Bandwagonesque</em></strong> has weathered better than many of its trendsetting counterparts. Time and distance set it apart from the glut of  post-<strong>Nirvana</strong> bandwagon jumpers revealing it to be a truly enjoyable set of fuzzed-out, <strong>Big Star</strong> and <strong>Byrds</strong>-inspired pop-rock ditties in its own right.<span id="more-3316"></span></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/bandwagonesque.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" />I remember being lukewarm on the album at the time of its release. I was a bit of a <strong>Cohen</strong>/<strong>Dylan</strong> snob at the time and the idea of a song repeating the one line &#8220;what you do to me&#8221; offended my lyrical sensibilities. I also found the feedback noise of tracks like &#8220;<strong>Satan</strong>&#8221; to be contrived and half-assed. I now think both are, if not brilliant po-mo statements on popular music, excellent examples of what a melodic-leaning rock&#8217;n'roll record should be. Infectious, rawkus, sloppy and finely crafted, it&#8217;s perhaps the definitive time-capsule of alternative rock circa 1991.</p>
<p>Over the years my &#8220;meh&#8221; feelings towards the album have slowly transformed into a begrudging appreciation and then into respect and even awe. Where <em><strong>Nevermind</strong></em>, <strong><em>Copper Blue </em></strong>and <strong><em>Dirty</em></strong> have started (or some time ago began) to sound like dated relics of the era, <em>Bandwagonesque</em> keeps getting better. It has even somehow remained relatively fresh sounding.</p>
<p>It could be due in part to their devotion to their classic-rock influences. Most of the songs on the album wouldn&#8217;t sound out of place played by a <strong>Neil Young</strong> or an <strong>Alex Chilton</strong> but with <strong>Kevin Shields</strong> snuck into their backing band.</p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s really the secret of the album&#8217;s success. Though it&#8217;s called <em>Bandwagonesque</em>, Fanclub aren&#8217;t really bandwagon jumpers. They didn&#8217;t write songs to specifically fit the alt-rock format, they wrote timelessly great, sticky, pop-rock songs (&#8220;<strong>The Concept</strong>&#8220;, &#8220;<strong>Alcoholiday</strong>&#8220;, &#8220;<strong>December</strong>&#8220;) which just happened to be produced with enough feedback, fuzzy distortion and washed-out noise to fit in with the day&#8217;s fashions on both sides of the Atlantic.</p>
<p>Put in human terms, <em>Bandwagonesque</em> is like that wallflower in your freshman French class you ignore, who blooms in senior year, becomes the queen of the prom and you spend the rest of your life secretly devoted to. Only I&#8217;m not secretly devoted to this album, I&#8217;m quite public about my love for it. In many ways this is the &#8220;first love&#8221; I judge all new noise-pop records against.</p>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 17 &#8211; Can: Unlimited Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/bone-rolling-reviews-17-can-unlimited-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/bone-rolling-reviews-17-can-unlimited-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=3275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.
Today&#8217;s roll: 1 – 5 – 13.
Result: Unlimited Edition by Can.
 
The danger with odds&#8217;n'ends collections is they tend towards half-baked experiments and an overall incohesive listening experience. Aggravatingly, there&#8217;s usually at least one of the band&#8217;s essential tracks on the thing. Can&#8217;s 1976 rarities compilation, Unlimited [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="null"><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR_banner2.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="81" /></a><span style="color: #ff0000"><em>Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.<br />
Today&#8217;s roll: <strong><span style="color: #000000">1</span> – <span style="color: #000000">5</span> – <span style="color: #000000">13</span></strong>.<br />
Result:</em> <span style="color: #000000"><strong>Unlimited Edition</strong></span><strong> </strong><em>by</em> <strong><span style="color: #000000">Can</span></strong><em>.</em></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000"> </span><br />
The danger with odds&#8217;n'ends collections is they tend towards half-baked experiments and an overall incohesive listening experience. Aggravatingly, there&#8217;s usually at least one of the band&#8217;s essential tracks on the thing. <strong>Can</strong>&#8217;s 1976 rarities compilation, <em><strong>Unlimited Edition</strong></em>, is no exception.</p>
<p><span id="more-3275"></span></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/g90554hxdrb.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="198" />Expanded from a fairly solid 1974 album titled <strong><em>Limited Edition</em></strong>, the &#8216;76 version is an unwieldy beast which covers pretty much every aspect of the adventurous and influential krautrock band&#8217;s ever-evolving sound. That&#8217;s not necessarily a good thing from an &#8220;album&#8221; perspective.</p>
<p>The disc gathers up the band&#8217;s orphans from the years 1968-75 which might not be a problem if the songs were arranged purely chronologically, but they&#8217;re not. I haven&#8217;t been able to discern why.</p>
<p>By 1975, Can were almost an entirely different band, with a different approach to making music. It would be like compiling a <strong>Brian Eno </strong>retrospective and tossing in some early <strong>Roxy Music</strong> in the middle of his later ambient work. The contrast might be interesting, but it wouldn&#8217;t flow.</p>
<p>Of course, in the technological golden age in which we gloriously languish, sequencing quibbles can be rectified by programming your CD player or, even more easily, editing out the bum tracks in iTunes (or your mediaplayer of choice). Which is what I did.</p>
<p>For my money, it&#8217;s the early nuggets which make this disc worth while—my personal cut-off date for Can is 1972. &#8220;<strong>Doko E</strong>.&#8221;, &#8220;<strong>LH 702</strong>&#8220;, &#8220;<strong>Mother Upduff</strong>&#8220;, &#8220;<strong>Connection</strong>&#8221; and a handful of others are excellent examples of their early period art-rock (many of these are available on other, perhaps more rewarding, Can compilations).</p>
<p>The early material is not all gold though. The 18 minute &#8220;<strong>Cutaway</strong>&#8220;, a surprisingly pointless and unlistenable collage of sounds and grooves from 1968,  didn&#8217;t make the cut. Nor did a sequence of short pieces call the &#8220;<strong>Ethnological Forgery Series</strong>&#8221; which, in the context of the album, serve to be no more than irritating clutter. They are also a little too accurately titled as they sound exactly like white guys committing world-music forgery. Though one appreciates honesty, it might have been a good idea to distract the listener from this flaw.</p>
<p>So, as it is with many b-sides and rareties collections, <em>Unlimited Edition </em>houses enough treasures for the dedicated Can aficionado to make it worth picking up (at least to rip a few gems off), but for casual or new listeners it&#8217;s far from essential.</p>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/bone-rolling-reviews-17-can-unlimited-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 16 &#8211; AC/DC: High Voltage</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-16-acdc-high-voltage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-16-acdc-high-voltage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1d20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[80's headbanger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AC/DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bone rolling reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cd review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high voltage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jakob from nerd hurdles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real punk rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[record review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the stooges]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=3178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.
Today&#8217;s roll: 1 – 1 – 2.
Result: High Voltage by AC/DC.
 
The award for most CDs by a band I hate on my shelf goes to AC/DC. The total is a whopping three titles by the audaciously long-running Aussie rockers. I should qualify my use of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="null"><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR_banner2.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="81" /></a><span style="color: #ff0000"><em>Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.<br />
Today&#8217;s roll: <strong><span style="color: #000000">1</span> – <span style="color: #000000">1</span> – <span style="color: #000000">2</span></strong>.<br />
Result:</em> <span style="color: #000000"><strong>High Voltage</strong></span><strong> </strong><em>by</em> <strong><span style="color: #000000">AC/DC</span></strong><em>.</em></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000"> </span><br />
The award for most CDs by a band I hate on my shelf goes to <strong>AC/DC</strong>. The total is a whopping three titles by the audaciously long-running Aussie rockers. I should qualify my use of the word &#8220;hate&#8221; here. What I mean when I write that I &#8220;hate&#8221; AC/DC is that I absolutely <em>loathe</em> them. That is I loathe them, and the weak parody they&#8217;ve become, <em>now</em>.</p>
<p>But AC/DC circa 1975/76 were one of the best rock&#8217;n'roll bands to ever have their glorious, grimy, debauched, sleazy lunacy committed to wax. <em><strong>High Voltage</strong></em> combines the the best of their first two Australian platters (one confusingly also titled <em>High Voltage</em>) to serve up as perfect a set of gutter-rock as you could hope to find this side of the first two <strong>Stooges</strong> albums.<span id="more-3178"></span></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/f72979yhodf.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="178" />To me AC/DC will always be synonymous with gravel-pit parties, cheap beer, stale pot smoke, the fear of getting beat up, struggling to jam through <strong>Zeppelin</strong>&#8217;s &#8220;The Ocean&#8221; without ever having listened to the whole song, older girls with teased hair, skull earrings, tight jeans, rusted-out cars, my psychotic cousin&#8217;s martial arts magazines strewn over his water-bed as he lies to me about stuff he&#8217;s done with girls, wispy moustaches on guys who can&#8217;t really grow them, <strong>Judas Priest </strong>back-patches on denim jackets, poor kids, trailer parks, not understanding, not belonging &#8230; being 15 in a small town.</p>
<p><strong><em>Highway to Hell</em></strong>, <strong><em>Dirty Deeds, Done Dirt Cheap</em></strong> and, to a lesser extent, <em>High Voltage</em> were the soundtracks for my middle- and high-school years as a headbanger. AC/DC was the one band everyone could agree on or at least tolerate.<strong> Iron Maiden</strong> and <strong>Black Sabbath</strong> were too dark for some people. <strong>Dokken</strong> and <strong>Ratt</strong> were too glam and people weren&#8217;t quite sure yet what to do with <strong>Slayer</strong>, <strong>Metallica</strong> and <strong>Venom,</strong> though we had an idea that was where we were headed.</p>
<p>But no one argued when you put on some DeeCee from <em><strong>Back in Black</strong></em> or earlier. It was party music, it was driving music, it was playing cards music, it was hanging out in the parking lot music.</p>
<p>The music was simple. Older kids grew up on it and it&#8217;s not so heavy younger kids couldn&#8217;t get into it. There&#8217;s no twin-guitar leads or time signature changes, there&#8217;s no sword and sorcery imagery. There <em>are </em>double entendres about testicles.</p>
<p>Their universal appeal was very much due to, before they jumped the musical shark, the <em>purity</em> of their music.<em> High Voltage </em>in particular showcases all the traits of a perfect, undiluted, unpretentious rock&#8217;n'roll record. It seethes with genuine disdain for the establishment. But not in an intellectual or political way; in a &#8220;don&#8217;t look down on me because I&#8217;m going to drink myself to death, fuck you, let&#8217;s rock&#8221; way.</p>
<p>AC/DC&#8217;s world is tiny on this record. It stretches from the stage, across the bar, to the back of the tour bus. This world is only populated with themselves, underage girls and the assholes standing in their way they&#8217;re going to have to plow right through.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re punks. They&#8217;re rocking. This record is, though it&#8217;s rarely thought of in these terms, one of the true early punk rock discs. It&#8217;s more punk rock than many bands who intentionally tried to make punk rock. By comparison intelligentsia-core bands like <strong>Hüsker Dü</strong> and <strong>Dead Kennedys</strong> come off like <strong>Fleetwood Mac</strong>.</p>
<p><em>High Voltage </em>captures the raw, reckless, unruly, adolescent and even naively innocent spirit of rock&#8217;n'roll in a way that&#8217;s been lost. There&#8217;s no polish, there&#8217;s no fat, there&#8217;s no play-acting. This is a truthful artistic statement from a band of young dirtbags who don&#8217;t give a shit about anything but the sex and drugs mythology of rock&#8217;n'roll.</p>
<p>You really can&#8217;t ask for anything more.</p>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr-16-acdc-high-voltage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 15 &#8211; King Crimson: Starless and Bible Black</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr15/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=3073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.
Today&#8217;s roll: 2 – 5 – 3.
Result: Starless and Bible Black by King Crimson.
 
With their first five albums, King Crimson precariously balanced a tightrope between progressive rock and that four-letter-word, prog. In 1974 they finally lost their balance and their sixth album, Starless and Bible Black, proves [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="null"><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR_banner2.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="81" /></a><span style="color: #ff0000"><em>Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.<br />
Today&#8217;s roll: <strong><span style="color: #000000">2</span> – <span style="color: #000000">5</span> – <span style="color: #000000">3</span></strong>.<br />
Result:</em> <span style="color: #000000"><strong>Starless and Bible Black</strong></span><strong> </strong><em>by</em> <strong><span style="color: #000000">King Crimson</span></strong><em>.</em></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000"> </span><br />
With their first five albums, <strong>King Crimson</strong> precariously balanced a tightrope between progressive rock and that four-letter-word, <em>prog</em>. In 1974 they finally lost their balance and their sixth album, <strong><em>Starless and Bible Black</em></strong>, proves what many had always believed. King Crimson were total wankers. <span id="more-3073"></span></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/KingCrimson-StarlessandBibleBlack.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /> From the get-go <strong>Robert Fripp</strong> used Crimson to push the pretension envelope. Their 1969 debut, <em><strong>In the Court of the Crimson King</strong></em>, blends jazz, metal, folk and classical into an audacious melange that was—and remains—truly progressive. It was also rock.</p>
<p>Over the next four albums, even in the songs featuring mainly strings, Mellotron and flute, there is a revolutionary fire that burns underneath. No matter how skilled the players or meticulous the arrangements are, it&#8217;s still rock&#8217;n'roll somehow.</p>
<p>If this creative fire was already beginning to diminish by 1973&#8217;s <em><strong>Larks&#8217; Tongue in Aspic</strong></em>, it&#8217;s all but extinguished with <em>Starless and Bible Black</em>.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t to say the album doesn&#8217;t technically &#8221;rock&#8221; in places. The opening track blasts in with a juggernaut of a groove and &#8220;<strong>Lament</strong>&#8221; does its best to shake the speakers. But everything on the album is stripped of its passion, replaced by inhumanly tight synchronized phrases which feel planned down to the last nuance of every note.</p>
<p>Though musicianship had always been a centerpiece of what King Crimson was all about, this is the first time the musicianship takes precedence over the music. Previously the players seemed to be mere conduits for a creative and inventive expression with a life of its own. <em>Starless</em>, on the other hand, feels as if it&#8217;s being played by joyless machines with a clinical exactness both impressive and nausea inducing.</p>
<p>This is the kairotic moment where <em>progressive rock</em> becomes the loathesome <em>prog</em>. When you can&#8217;t honestly call it <em>rock </em>anymore and the whole becomes less than the sum of its parts.</p>
<p>Fripp would remedy this later the same year with the kraut-rock and (sometimes collaborator) <strong>Brian Eno</strong> influenced <strong><em>Red</em></strong>, but <em>Starless</em> remains a milestone truly terrible album in the Crimson catalogue signifying the end of their genius, warning the listener to pass no further.</p>
<p>Simply put, <em>Starless and Bible Black </em>is unlistenable in its pretentiously cloying sterility.</p>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 14 &#8211; John Coltrane: The Olatunji Concert</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr14-john-coltrane-olatunji-concert/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr14-john-coltrane-olatunji-concert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alice coltrane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jazz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jazz cd review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john coltrane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharoah sanders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Olatunji Concert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trane]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=3021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.
Today&#8217;s roll: 4 – 6 – 11.
Result: The Olatunji Concert: The Last Live Recording by John Coltrane.
 
I was beginning to doubt my 1d4 was ever going to roll a four. I&#8217;m glad it finally did because CD tower #4 is where all my jazz, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="null"><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR_banner2.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="81" /></a><span style="color: #ff0000"><em>Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.<br />
Today&#8217;s roll: <strong><span style="color: #000000">4</span> – <span style="color: #000000">6</span> – <span style="color: #000000">11</span></strong>.<br />
Result:</em> <span style="color: #000000"><strong>The Olatunji Concert: The Last Live Recording</strong></span><strong> </strong><em>by</em> <strong><span style="color: #000000">John Coltrane</span></strong><em>.</em></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000"> </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">I was beginning to doubt my 1d4 was ever going to roll a four. I&#8217;m glad it finally did because CD tower #4 is where all my jazz, world music and hip-hop is located and it&#8217;s nice to write about it for a change. Now that I think about it, my CD filing system kind of smacks of segregation or apartheid or ghettoization. Well, I tried to mix my CDs in the past and it didn&#8217;t really work. That doesn&#8217;t make me a racist. Just a little OCD.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">But themes of ghettoization and segregation are fitting for this review. The last recorded live performace of <strong>John Coltrane</strong> (before succumbing to liver cancer in 1967) was captured at the newly opened <strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babatunde_Olatunji" target="_blank">Olatunji</a> Center for African Culture</strong> in New York. Here, Coltrane&#8217;s &#8220;second quartet&#8221; are in their prime and they&#8217;re playing as if the sheer force of their music could raise every black man, woman and child up from under oppression across America and the globe.<span id="more-3021"></span></span></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" style="border: black 1px solid" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/john_coltrane-olatunji_concert_span.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="180" /><span style="color: #000000">It should be noted part of the &#8220;heat &#8221; on the disc is created, not by the musicians, but by fledgling audio engineer, <strong>Bernard Drayton</strong>, recording everything too hot. It&#8217;s easily the one of the rawest, dirtiest Trane recordings in existence. His sax is in the red for most of the set and, where this might have been a disaster at another point in his career, it adds a ferocious fire that is suitable to the album. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">Drummer <strong>Rashied </strong><span style="color: #000000"><strong>Ali</strong></span>&#8217;s cymbals are compressed into a glaring white noise and at times <strong>Jimmy Garrison</strong>&#8217;s bass sounds like it&#8217;s being run through a Fuzzface stompbox. These are good things in the context of the music.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">Again, if the performances weren&#8217;t so impassioned, this might not be a virtue. Microphones drop in and out, creating odd, intermintent panning and phasing effects. From a technical standpoint the recording is a fiasco. It&#8217;s doubtful, if this weren&#8217;t the final live testament of John Coltrane, that these recordings would have seen the light of day outside of the bootleg circuit. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">On the other hand, at this point in his career, Trane was still pushing his music further and further into the cosmos. It would have been interesting to see where the 1970s might have taken him. Maybe fuzz and wah-wah pedals would have become part of his gear as they did for <strong>Miles Davis</strong>. Or would he have mellowed and reverted to a more traditional jazz approach, perhaps akin to <strong>Wynton Marsalis</strong>?</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">The latter seems doubtful, at least in the immediate future, as the records his wife, <strong>Alice Coltrane</strong>, issued after his death were adventurous and innovative. One has to wonder what further collaboration between the two giants might have spawned. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">Something wonderful judging by her piano solo starting at the ten-minute mark of &#8220;<strong>Ogunde</strong>&#8220;. It&#8217;s one of the highlights of this disc. Fluid and scorching like a river molten rock, it twists and flows over the next six minutes, burning everything in its path. Perhaps the only thing hotter on the album is <strong>Pharoah Sanders</strong>&#8216; skronking tenor solos which sound especially brutal here against Trane&#8217;s more finessed improvisations. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000"><em>The Olatunji Concert </em>certainly isn&#8217;t the best of the many Coltrane albums produced in his final months, but it&#8217;s a wonderful document of where the second quartet was at and hint at where they might have gone. Technical flaws in the recording really only add a visceral immediacy to the listening experience. Unlike with a <strong>Bob Thiele</strong> or <strong>Rudy Van Gelder</strong> recording, you won&#8217;t be able to close your eyes and imagine you&#8217;re <em>there</em>. But you&#8217;ll feel like you were when it&#8217;s over, scorched eardrums and all.</span></p>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/brr14-john-coltrane-olatunji-concert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>13/2009: The year of noise-pop</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/best-albums-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/best-albums-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=2973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found 2009 to be an unusually strong year for music. Or perhaps more specifically, the kind of indie rock  I like. Pop music moves in cycles. At times the cycles seem to be revving at a million RPM and at others they all have flat tires.
The beginning of the decade saw everyone was trying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/132009-1.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" />I found <strong>2009</strong> to be an unusually strong year for music. Or perhaps more specifically, the kind of indie rock  I like. Pop music moves in cycles. At times the cycles seem to be revving at a million RPM and at others they all have flat tires.</p>
<p>The beginning of the decade saw everyone was trying to sound like <strong>Gang of Four</strong>, <strong>New Order</strong> and <strong>PIL</strong>. I was pretty happy until wagon-jumpers started cloning the clones and the genes got too diluted.</p>
<p>Then the ‘00s seemed to hit a dry spell for indie rock. Free-psyche took its place for a while but by 2007-08 it seemed like everything was hitting a drought. I’m not sure I’ve been able to scrape an end-of-year top five together for the last three years much less a top ten.</p>
<p>This year I was able to jot down 13 titles without even thinking about it. Was it a strong year? Was I just more receptive to new music? Is it just that once again, like 1999-2003, one of the kinds of music I like (this time it&#8217;s <strong>noise-pop</strong>) is back in style and is being given a dust-off and a fresh coat of paint? Perhaps.</p>
<p>I’ve written about some of these albums already, and not all fall under the “noise-pop” umbrella, but here is, by my reckoning, the T<strong>op 13 Albums of 2009 in No Particular Order.</strong><span id="more-2973"></span></p>
<p><strong>Japandroids: <em>Post-Nothing</em></strong> — This duo from Vancouver remind us all that when you blend “pop” and “punk” it doesn’t have to sounds like <strong>Blink 182</strong>. It can sound like pop-punk was meant to sound like. <strong>Superchunk</strong> meets <strong>Husker-Du</strong> in the rec-room of <strong>The Replacements’</strong> mom’s house and no one remembered to take out the trash.</p>
<p><strong>Girls: <em>Album</em></strong> — I like the idea of <strong>Elvis Costello</strong>. It’s a great theory, but in practice it’s somewhat of a disappointing experience. Especially that first album. Girls found a way to put the theory into practice and make it work. All it took was a little more of <strong>Johnathan Richmond’s</strong> wry nihilism and some lo-fi garage-punk aesthetic. After all this time, someone figured it out.</p>
<p><strong>The xx: <em>xx</em></strong> — Ex-ex or double ex? I don’t know. I do know that they sound a lot like <strong>Stars</strong>. Just as well since the Montreal storytellers seem to have suddenly stopped putting out brilliant pop records with their last few EPs of boring drivel. So while The xx aren’t even aping a band from 25 years ago (like most acts this decade have), they at least have the foresight to pick one of the best and have the chops to pull it off. They even add a little bit of surf-guitar twang to the breathy girl-boy vocals, catchy hooks and a nice beats. Nice die-cut cover too.</p>
<p><strong>The Drums: <em>Summertime EP</em></strong> — “Don’t Be a Jerk, Johnny” could be a sequel to “Johnny Are You Queer?” only it’s better. Drums are almost like a cuter, happier version of <strong>Magnetic Fields</strong>. Infectious three-chord party-pop for roof-top parties in the… well… summertime.</p>
<p><strong>Crocodiles: <em>Summer of Hate</em></strong> — “I Wanna Kill” sounds so much like a <em><strong>Psychocandy</strong></em> b-side you’d swear it’s <strong>Jesus and Mary Chain</strong>. That’s a good and bad thing. Zero points for originality, ten points for awesomeness. It also sets the listener up for a little bit of disappointment the whole album isn’t quite so reverential to JAMC’s television-static bubblegum. Still, even if the noise-pop that rounds out the disc is more “noise” than “pop” it’s still pretty great. Perhaps greater.</p>
<p><strong>The Pains of Being Pure at Heart: <em>The Pains of Being Pure at Heart</em></strong> — The best album <strong>Slumberland</strong> forgot to put out in 1992? Almost contrived in the perfect way they blend of early 90’s American dream-pop, a little brit-pop and shoegaze, these kids come off sort of like a <strong>Superchunk</strong>/<strong>Velocity Girl</strong> side project where they put on fake British accents. That’s the second time I’ve name-dropped Superchunk in this article. Actually this is shaping up to be a string of comparisons to bands from when I was young. Anyway… The Pains of Being Pure at Heart are as cute and infectious as any band, anywhere at anytime.</p>
<p><strong>Woods: <em>Songs of Shame</em></strong> — These freaky folksters eschew the <strong>Bolan</strong>-esque airy-fairy imagery of the <strong>Banhart</strong> school of eccentricity for a more <strong>CSNY</strong> approach. If <strong>Pavement</strong> had been trying to emulate <strong>America</strong> or <strong>CCR</strong>, they might have sounded like this. That’s a good thing, by the way. Lo-fi folk-rock hasn’t been this catchy and exciting in years.</p>
<p><strong>Sonic Youth: <em>The Eternal</em></strong> — A return to the more organic, psychedelic flow of <em><strong>A Thousand Leaves</strong></em> but with the punky punch of <strong><em>Goo</em></strong> and the noise experimentation of <em><strong>NYC Ghosts &amp; Flowers</strong></em>. A true return to form by alt-rock veterans.</p>
<p><strong>Crystal Stilts: <em>Alight of Night</em></strong> — If <strong>Magnetic Fields</strong>’ <em><strong>Distortion</strong></em> had been good instead of embarrassing, this might have been that record. That’s my second name-drop of Magnetic Fields. Let’s drop some more. Stick <strong>Violent Femmes</strong>, <strong>Joy Division</strong> and JAMC in a blender, hit “frappe” and drink down this reverb and despair rock’n’roll smoothie.</p>
<p><strong>Raveonettes: <em>In and Out of Control</em></strong> — While I’m tossing-out names like plates at a Greek wedding, let’s drop JAMC one more time. If <strong>John Hughes</strong> got to produce a JAMC album, this might have been it. I’m almost suspicious this album is actually a mash-up of <strong>M83</strong>’s <em><strong>Saturdays=Youth</strong></em> and <em><strong>Barbed Wire Kisses</strong></em>. It’s that good.</p>
<p><strong>James Blackshaw:</strong> The Glass Bead Game — There are no names to drop in this review. Well, maybe <strong>John Fahey</strong>. Maybe <strong>Jack Rose</strong>. James Blackshaw is a free-folk 12-string virtuoso. Well, “virtuoso” might be stretching it. But he sure is some kind of good. I usually get a bit sickly from this kind of wankery but James manages to make some gorgeous, gorgeous music that makes me forget he’s playing too many notes and vegan girls probably throw their diva cups on stage when he’s playing.</p>
<p><strong>Tune Yards: <em>Bird Brains</em></strong> — I feel a bit dodgy including this one on the list since I’m still new to it and I haven’t internalized it fully. I’m pretty confident it may end up being one of my all-time faves. It may not, but at the moment I’m really impressed with it’s fresh blend of abstract indie-folk meets 8-bit trip-hop. And that bluesy voice! It reminds me of a lo-fi, folky <strong>Tricky</strong> at his weirdest. I’m looking forward to getting to know this lady better.</p>
<p><strong>Akron/Family: <em>Set ‘em Wild, Set ‘em Free</em></strong> — Not too many bands from the original “New Weird America” outbreak are still making good records. Is this one of the Family’s best? Yes and no? Maybe. No. Yes. Kind of. It was much better than just “better than I expected.” It’s pretty great, really. They finally got all their influences corralled and lined up to be deployed effectively instead of their previous free-range approach. Breaking free of <strong>M. Gira</strong>’s gravitational pull probably also did them in good stead. They still sound like they wish it was 1972, but that’s what’s great about them.</p>
<p><strong>Also rans:</strong> A Place To Bury Strangers: <em>Exploding Head</em>; Pet Shop Boys: <em>Yes</em>; The Big Pink: <em>A Brief History of Love</em>; Jonsi and Alex: <em>Riceboy Sleeps</em>; Mirah: <em>(A)spera</em>; Sufjan Stevens: <em>The BQE</em></p>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/best-albums-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bone Rolling Reviews 13 &#8211; Lazycame: Finbegin</title>
		<link>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/bone-rolling-reviews-13-lazycame-finbegin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/bone-rolling-reviews-13-lazycame-finbegin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bone rolling reviews jakob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finbegin review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jamc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jesus and mary chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lazycame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sister vanilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[william reid solo project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplysyndicated.com/?p=2938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.
Today&#8217;s roll: 2 – 4 – 9.
Result: Finbegin by Lazycame.
 

After the Jesus and Mary Chain hot-rod sputtered to rickety halt in 1998, the brothers Reid popped up here and there in a few projects. In 2005 Sister Vanilla saw their sister Linda on board as a singer for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="null"><img class="alignleft" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/BRR_banner2.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="81" /></a><span style="color: #ff0000"><em>Jakob rolls 1d4, 1d12 and 1d20 to select a CD from his collection to review.<br />
Today&#8217;s roll: <strong><span style="color: #000000">2</span> – <span style="color: #000000">4</span> – <span style="color: #000000">9</span></strong>.<br />
Result:</em> <strong><span style="color: #000000">Finbegin</span></strong><em><strong> </strong>by</em> <strong><span style="color: #000000">Lazycame</span></strong><em>.</em></span></p>
<p> 
<p>
After the <strong>Jesus and Mary Chain</strong> hot-rod sputtered to rickety halt in 1998, the brothers <strong>Reid</strong> popped up here and there in a few projects. In 2005 <strong>Sister Vanilla</strong> saw their sister <strong>Linda</strong> on board as a singer for probably their best record  since <strong><em>Honey&#8217;s Dead.</em> </strong>Yet it wasn&#8217;t so good a record as to inspire anybody notice or care. Too bad because it&#8217;s a great slice of poppy rock&#8217;n'roll (aptly titled <em><strong>Little Pop Rock</strong></em>). Though a bit smoother and shinier than JAMC ever tried to be, the chrome finish is still a little rusted, dusty and scuffed. Of course, if <strong>Scarlett Johansson</strong> (who&#8217;d sang with them at their <strong>Coachella</strong> reunion show) had been the vocalist, then maybe things would have gone differently. Perhaps in the worst possible way.
<div>As neat and tidy as Sister Vanilla were, <strong>William Reid</strong>&#8217;s solo project, <strong>Lazycame</strong>, is an entirely different animal. It&#8217;s ramshackle, lo-fi, messy, unpleasant, unfocused and, at times, brilliant. <span id="more-2938"></span>
</div>
<p>
<div><img class="alignleft" style="border: black 1px solid" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v312/ampcom/rev558.gif" alt="" width="200" height="200" />You really cannot make a case for much of <em><strong>Finbegin </strong></em>(2001) being anything other than bedroom demos for the JAMC completist. Usually just an acoustic guitar and a vocal with a second guitar overdub, the tracks generally have that compressed, slightly fuzzy sound of a cassette four-track which can be charming enough.
<p>Still, the first three songs really come-off like unfinished JAMC cast-offs, probably recorded in one take. Intriguing for the fan, but not much there to hold interest over repeated listenings and the casual listener might mistake it for unearthed demos by a particularly strung-the-fuck-out <strong>Lou Reed</strong>.</div>
<p><div>Things get worse with &#8220;<strong>Rokit</strong>&#8220;, a uniquely abysmal piece of noise-tronica. Truly a blight on the ears. Few tracks have ever made me wish deafness on myself like this one does. I&#8217;m also a little surprised it wasn&#8217;t a bit of an underground hit since this kind of thing is quite popular in certain circles. Circles six though nine of Hell, that is.</div>
<p><div>The fifth track onwards though is where the record starts to get interesting. It goes from Reid&#8217;s half-baked, three-chord would-be JAMC ditties to entirely <em>baked</em> (in another sense) psychedelic stews. The meandering &#8221;<strong>Gogetfind</strong>&#8221; sounds like the worst case of heroin withdrawal ever recorded and  &#8221;<strong>Naturallow</strong>&#8221; could be a mistaken for a particularly messy <strong>Spacemen 3</strong> track. Both are brilliant but the centerpiece of the album is the spectacular &#8220;<strong>Fornicate</strong>.&#8221;</div>
<p><div>It&#8217;s the weirdest, most ramshackle, absurd and, simply, best thing Reid has ever recorded. A rambling drone with tabla, bizarro vocalizations, white-noise and Eastern influences, it sounds, almost, like nothing he&#8217;s touched before. Pure, free expression. The closest reference point would be a feral <strong>Six Organs of Admittance</strong>. The track swirls in and out of existence leaving you wanting more. Perhaps not something all JAMC fans would appreciate or expect, but for those who also enjoy free-psyche, it&#8217;s worth investing in the album for alone (or seeking out on iTunes).</div>
<p><div>The rest of album is rounded out with a few more JAMC style acoustic numbers, but generally better ones than at the start of the program. &#8220;<strong>Unfinished Business</strong>&#8221; sounds a bit like the song <strong>Oasis</strong> should have followed-up &#8220;<strong>Wonderwall</strong>&#8221; with. This CD edition contains two hidden tracks. One is actually a Sister Vanilla track and the other, I believe, shows up on the second Lazycame album.</div>
<p><div>Ultimately, the thing about <em>Finbegin</em>, and Lazycame in general, is it&#8217;s not very good. Points of brilliance, but these jewels have to be dug out of a mound of nearly unlistenable excrement. Myself, I&#8217;m a big enough JAMC fan I don&#8217;t mind getting elbow-deep into their offal. But it&#8217;s hard to justify recommending the experience to others.</div>
<p>
<div></div>
» Jakob, co-host of <b><i>Nerd Hurdles</i></b>.<br>
<a href="http://nerdhurdles.com">nerdhurdles.com</a> |
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nerdhurdles">Nerd Hurdles' Twitter</a> | 
<a href="http://mrdapper.wordpress.com">Mr. Dapper's Splendid Online Diary</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplysyndicated.com/bone-rolling-reviews-13-lazycame-finbegin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
